The skyrocketing cost of insurance premiums in Florida is leading residents to drop their insurance, consider selling their home, and even move out of the state, according to recent reports.

For years now, the sunny, vibrant state has been a magnetic destination for many Americans—a phenomenon which has been driving up demand for housing, especially during the pandemic, as well as home prices.

But while Florida was the number one state in the country that people moved to in 2022, it was also the one with the highest number of residents wanting to relocate, according to a SelfStorage.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s a good thing their Republican Leaders are working hard to help them with this issue.

  • hperrin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sell their homes to who? Is this like a NFT, always a bigger fool, kind of thing?

    • quindraco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      To landlords, who will charge arbitrarily high rent, secure in the knowledge that they aren’t in a free market due to inelasticity of demand (people can’t do without shelter) and supply (there are finite places to live). That will let them pay the insurance premiums homeowners can’t afford.

    • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans who want to jerk off to DeSantis and let some racial slurs fly without social opprobrium.

      That’s who has been moving there since 2020 or so.

      • Vanon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Some people see Florida as America’s floppy, deformed penis. Others see it more as a nauseating dookie emerging from the south. Scientists are still studying the area to find the causes of the mass psychosis, but urge all healthy adults to avoid the region and its inhabitants.

    • rchive@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Everything has a buyer at some price. These people will just have to sell at a loss, probably.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    They were laughing at Californians when it was happening to us (very very recently) thinking that it was the result of “liberal policymaking”.

    Well, how does it feel, Florida? Are you ready to put aside our differences and go after our real common enemy, the for-profit insurance industry and climate deniers? Because I promise you, this is only going to get worse unless we force them to change things.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        He probably does think that. He could spin rising premiums as speculation based on climate change belief.

        • limelight79@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          Watch: More legislation on insurance prices in the state.

          Or, they could pull a North Carolina and outlaw any discussion of sea level rise.

          • lad@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Seriously, there are places where climate change (discussion) is banned? This is mind blowing

            We should just ban it everywhere, and that’s it, problem solved 🤦‍♂️

          • ____@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lord, don’t even get me started on NC property insurance. Their solution to increasing rates for many years was to mandate that rates couldn’t exceed x, based on what they believed was appropriate.

            Protip: It wasn’t appropriate. I’ve been out of that game for long enough now that I don’t know if they ever fixed it, but it was bad - basically if you couldn’t write a policy within x% of the expected rate, the risk had to be ceded to the state’s reinsurance facility, which drastically limited the available coverage.

          • flerp@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            He can’t beat big business. If he tries it will ruin him even more than he is already ruined. Give him all the ideas.

      • Joker@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        He will pass a new law allowing him to fire insurance companies’ boards and install his own people. Make America Florida! Yeehaw!

    • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Insurers aren’t really to blame here. Florida is a fundamentally high-risk place to build and live now, and will continue to get worse for the foreseeable future due to climate change. Even a non-profit insurer would need to price Florida insurance at a premium, lest its funds be exhausted when the inevitable category-6 hurricane hits the state.

      Arguably the ones most to blame (after the fossil fuel industry, for putting us in this position in the first place of course) is corrupt politicians and developers who allow such shoddy construction in the state in the first place.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        We don’t just allow construction in risky places, we subsidize it. If you’re an owner or developer and you wanna put your own money at risk by building in risky places, you should be allowed to do that. Just don’t expect me to pay for it through taxes and FEMA flood insurance.

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Maybe it’s not quite comparable to the situation in California, now that I think about it. Florida has always been in the path of devastating hurricanes for as long as I can remember. There is a degree of assumed risk living there. In California, these massive wildfires almost never happened and now suddenly it happens every year without fail no matter how hard we try to contain them. I live in an area that has never been hit by a wildfire, but because California as a whole has been hit so hard so many times recently, rates get raised to untenable levels and State Farm won’t even write you a policy. It’s completely mad.

        Like, I get it, it’s not the insurance company’s fault that we live in the path of predictable destruction, but there has to be a better solution than “move somewhere else if you don’t like it”. I wonder if we can learn something from studying the insurance models of other countries that are prone to disaster (Island nations in Asia that are frequently hit by typhoons, for example) and adapting that to how policies are tailored here?

      • Blackhole@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The category of hurricane isn’t the problem, it’s the frequency. 5 category 2s are way worse than 1 cat 4 or 5, in terms of economic cost, typically.

        • MooseBoys@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I was using cat6 as a stand-in for “all the bad stuff”. There’s never been a category 6 hurricane before.

    • willis936@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly I’m on team insurance in these cases. The US is filthy rich and we have tons of highly habitable land. Why are we wasting resources subsidizing some people choosing to live in comfortable, risky locations?

      For those stuck in poverty: that does suck but I consider that an independent issue.

    • ours@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Free hand of the market is giving them an invisible bitchslap.

      Soon they’ll be “free” from insurance.

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good. Subsidizing risky behavior, as we do with some kinds of disaster insurance, encourages risky behavior. Rising insurance costs are the market telling people to stop living in certain places. We’d do well to listen and stop living in places like Florida so much.

    • superguy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you ready to put aside our differences and go after our real common enemy, the for-profit insurance industry and climate deniers?

      Nah. Republicans never admit when they are wrong.

  • OhmsLawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s interesting to me that insurance companies are becoming the chief drivers of the preparation for climate change: “Wanna build a house in the woods? On a sandbar? GTFO. Use your own money.”

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well yeah. The cost of damage resulting from rising sea levels are one of the negative externalities that result from burning fossil fuels. Insurance premiums are effectively passing that cost on to future flood victims.

      That means the right market-based solution, which both parties claim to love, is to apply an appropriately sized carbon tax, thereby internalizing those costs in the price of fuel, and using the funds to pay for flood mitigation and future damage, but that looks too much like socialism…

      • rchive@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The criticisms I hear from the American left about carbon taxes is that they don’t work, not that they look like socialism. I think they probably would work, but what do I know.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whatever it takes to finally get people to realize that living in a disaster zone is a terrible idea.

    • GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The current crisis isn’t so much about climate change as it is an insurance market so rampant with fraudulent roof damage claims that the market can’t bear it. FL legislature tried to correct this but before the law took effect a flood of claims were filed.

      Climate change will only make this worse, ofc.

      • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        My understanding is that the substantial majority of roof damage claims were legitimate and attributable to predatory roofing companies that would finance and install new roofs after a storm at a huge discount, they’d install a shitty fucked up roof, then would sell the debt to a third party servicer, and then the roofing company would close up shop, rebrand under a new name, and do it again. By the time the roof fails, the original company is long gone leaving the homeowner and the insurers holding the bag.

        The legislature and the insurers realized they had a impending consumer crisis and loosened the laws about paying these claims, and essentially opened the door to the fraud.

        I wonder if the real issue at this point is that Florida just attracts fraudsters. It was their laws that allowed contractors to have a revolving door of LLC’s.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Of course it is. Nobody will do business with the shitty roof company that no longer exists ever again. See, the invisible hand works just fine, and might even give you a handjob if you pay it enough.

      • Pons_Aelius@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not being able to sell them (except for 10 cents on the dollar of what they paid) when they cannot be insured will be the next shock.

        • CmdrShepard@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah we saw that happen in places like Detroit during the recession, but I doubt it’ll get quite that bad ($100 homes) since Florida at least has good weather going for it.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    1 year ago

    It won’t be long, and in Florida the cost for the mortgage will be neglectable in comparison to the costs of insurance.

    The big downside will be that Floridians will move out of Florida and spread elsewhere. Maybe it is time for Georgia and Alabama to invest in a massive fence?

  • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 year ago

    Insurance typically works off historical data to evaluate risk from my understanding, and having something as disastrous as the Miami beach condo collapse bodes a bad sign for insurance companies, especially given the terrible and absolutely incompetent rescue effort during the aftermath.

    By the way, I’m shocked at how quickly the Miami condo collapse left the news cycle.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Iirc Florida passed some kind of law requiring coverage no matter where a structure is. And the only way the companies could make it work was massive premium increases because the places they’re being forced to cover literally have to be rebuilt every year. This was after the federal government said it wouldn’t offer disaster insurance on those zones anymore.

    • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair to Florida, that condo was built pre-Andrew and they revised their entire building code after Andrew. There aren’t too many large building built pre-Andrew anymore because they were all built as cheap as possible to laundrr drug money.

      That being said, there are a million reasons why i would never move to Florida, and the only building codes that can prevent your house getting inundated by flood surge is by putting it on stilts, so no shocker that the premiums are skyrocketing. Same with fire insurance in California right now.

      • Margot Robbie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        The building collapse was due to bad building code for sure; however, the apathy that followed the tragedy, both from rescue workers and the public at large, was really disheartening.

      • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d build a 3d printed house that is on a raised slab in Florida and in Cali. Anything out of wood would be a waste

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In California you’d largely be fine as long as you take care to have land around your house and keep it defensible. A lot of the fires that get into towns are because those recommendations and regulations get ignored in favor of trying to live in a forest as much as possible.

          • Pasta4u@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can do everything roght but your neighbors might not. I have family that lost thier home a few years ago in a fire and have moved to San Fran now

        • Fosheze@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Alternatively just build it dirt cheap and expect to rebuild every year. Disposable housing, the real american way.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    lol @ all the people who fled the northeast because “Florida is cheap…”

    Even the second place finisher of the Carolinas has gotten too expensive.

      • 4lan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Greedflation is real

        My rent went up 24% this month. Now I’m paying half of my income to one corporation

        More than my parents mortgage on their house

        • vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I bought a house I didn’t really want recently because my rent had gone up 50% in the previous two years, and was going to go up another 10% if I renewed again. Prices are out of control.

          • Fosheze@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Same here. I was looking at renting and the cheapest apartment I could find was the same cost as a mortgage on a house. So I just bought a shitty house that I still can’t afford but I guess I’m at least building equity so that’s nice.

            • 4lan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Doesn’t that require you to have tens of thousands of dollars for a down payment?

              • Fosheze@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                For a first time home owner mortgage you can put 0% down. You just also have to pay for “private mortgage insurance” until you have 20% equity in the house and that insurance is not cheap so the more you can put down the better.

                In my case I think the PMI costs me almost $200 per month but I think it’s based off the value of the home and mine was dirt cheap. I’m also lucky in that my dad is a carpenter and taught me how to do most of that stuff so I had the option of buying an absolute shitheap and making it livable on my own. I had also been working constant overtime for a year straight while living in my dads basement so I did have a bit of cash saved up, but most of that money went into repairs on the house I bought rather than the down payment. I also live in a very low COL area so my house was way cheaper than it is in most of the country.

                So I’m definitely not saying “why doesn’t everyone just buy a house?” Because I was just very lucky in a lot of respects. But buying a house is more feasable than most people think it is. You definitely don’t need to put 20% down; doing that is only really expected if you’re selling your current house to buy another or if you’re buying a second house.

          • 4lan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A tiny condo where I live costs half a million dollars. You cannot buy a house for under a million

        • Grumpy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Most jurisdictions have tenant protection laws that prevent such rent raises unless you did something wrong. If not the latter, I’d try and talk to some tenant protection organization in your area. They tend to be free consultation. If not, there’s always a lawyer as well. You could even be entitled to getting money back if they did illegal rent raises.

          • 4lan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are zero protections where I live They could raise the rent 1,000% if they like.

            Every complex in the area raise the rent at the same time from 1700 to 2000 for a one-bedroom apartment.

            When I got the renewal offer I checked everywhere and I would have to move an hour away in an area where you wake up to gunfire to pay $1,700 a month again.

            I spoke to the manager of the complex to negotiate the rent increase and they just told me it’s the “market rate”. I’ve spoke to other neighbors and they have the same rate that I do so it’s not a ‘punitive rate’

            I had like a week to decide so I’m going to ride out this year and leave the area next fall.

        • rchive@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Don’t worry, housing prices will crash next year and then you can buy cheap. Lol

            • rchive@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I was kind of joking, but I did see this recently which made me wonder if the institutional buyers/investors thing is a bit overhyped and coming to an end not that far into the future:

              Link

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Actually I very specifically voted against it, but my vote wasn’t enough. I’m really hopeful that the GOP will finally just implode now that the MAGAts and the more traditional trickle-down conservatives are at each others throats, but I’m also not naive enough to think that’s guaranteed or even likely. With the luck we’ve been having lately most likely some even worse more virulently stupid and corrupt version of the GOP will rise from the ashes.

  • Hypx@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    People move to Florida for the same reason why people use to move to California. So you wonder when housing prices will absolutely soar. Also, lack of natural disaster preparedness is something that can’t be ignored in Florida. Deregulation won’t solve that problem.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      But when you have banned all wokeness (whatever that is), surely all problems will be solved?

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    So much for DeathSantis utopia. Go back to Florida and don’t bring your Nazi politics to my state.

    • DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      40% of voting Floridians voted against DeSantis, Florida is also the state with the third highest Jewish population, I’m fairly certain that nowhere near all of Florida has “Nazi” politics.

      Maybe try not sounding like an ignorant by generalizing the third most populated state, which is also just as mixed as the other three most populated states. You’re just sounding like those idiots that bitch about how California is all “liberal” while ignoring the conservative North Cali and all of the Neo-Con enclaves and Nazis in between.

      Sure the Florida GOP are pretty much Nazi-lite, but there’s a shitload of Florida citizens who are not them and completely disagree with them and are doing what they can to push back against them.

    • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a storage unit company, so presumably they have their own moving service or often connect people with other moving services. They’d be able to see the trend

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah… that still seems like some extremely flimsy evidence to base an article on.

        Edit - didn’t notice this was from Newsweek. “Journalism”

        Maybe I should connect them with my local bartender. He’s full of information. Qualification? He talks to people.

        • rchive@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The article also mentions how storms are becoming increasingly deadly, which they’re not, necessarily. It’s so up and down year to year it’s hard to pick out an actual trend.

    • Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      They didn’t finish the sentence

      …according to a SelfStorage service clerk working in Tampa /S