• C​​​@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago

    I saw a physics question once that ended with: “For the purposes of this exercise assume the Earth is flat.”

  • PP44@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 years ago

    I may be taking this too seriously, but the bear should bounce all the way down along with the ball after the first bounce of the ball and the first step of the bear. When they meet, the ball is at its peak and have no energy, potential or kinetic. It cannot prevent the bear from falling with it.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      I mean, if we interpret that curvature as that actually being the highest point to which the ball would rise without a bear in the way, then yeah.

      To me, that curvature doesn’t look quite quadratic enough at the top, so presumably the bear threw it downwards with a bit of speed and then kicks it back down with every step. So, the ball would still have kinetic energy when it’s at the height of the bear.

      • PP44@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        Oh you’re right ! It’s even clearly suggested in the second image… I really was tired when I wrote this shitty comment…

        • Ephera@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          No worries, I didn’t really look at that second panel either until after I came up with that explanation.