• Faceman🇦🇺@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Of course they do, no matter how good the physical camera and lenses get (and they have improved a lot in the last 10 years) you still cant fight physics, the size of the parts in a phone camera mean you are always working near, or well past the diffraction limit so there is a physical limit on the detail they can render, no matter how many megapixel you throw at it…

    The average phone buyer doesn’t give a shit how much AI enhancement is going on in their photos, if on average their photos look better, they will buy it regardless of whether it’s “real” or not. honestly this isn’t really much different to any photo you take on a modern phone, they already use AI enhancement for texture recovery, sharpening, face and subject detection, “cosmetic smoothing”, etc… etc… etc…

    They do say they are using AI enhancement so they aren’t really lying… at least not in the legal sense. People that actually want to take photos of the moon will still use real cameras.

    Edit: oops lemmys doing the old posts on front page thing again lol.

  • _ed
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s VW dieselgate all over again.

  • D2L@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was interesting as fuck. Sad I had to go to reddit to read it, but what a crock of shit Samsung.

    • salaruaOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      sorry, this was before the Reddit meltdown