• lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Bible doesn’t need to be 100% accurate to be useful as a historical document. It certainly appears to contain a lot of historical content if you ignore the supernatural embellishments, and probably more importantly it’s being used as a historical source for claims about who owns Palestine, so it’s the ideal source to refute those particular claims to the audience most likely to believe them.