• someacnt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But… but they are soo small and fragile-looking!

      • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So are all baby animals. Which is the only life stage of their species you’ve probably ever seen because most pet ones never live even close to their maximum lifespan.

        Also, jellyfish are even more fragile looking yet some can theoretically live forever. Looking fragile to humans does not mean they aren’t well adapted to survive for a long time in their natural habitat.

        • someacnt
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I… I just cannot accept this reality. How did I, how do people, how… how could this misfortune happen???

          • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Because of the industrialized pet industry, the likes of PetSmart. They’ve convinced people that small pets like fish are products that can be thrown away instead of living individuals. They’d rather your small pet die in two weeks because that just means you’ll be back to buy another one, so they’ve launched a propaganda campaign against any sentiment of responsibly caring for them and fooled the majority of people into thinking that it’s just their normal lifespan and they need way less care, equipment and commitment than they actually do.

    • Rodeo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are related but not that closely. They share the same taxonomic family, but not the same genus. It’s like saying a fallow deer and a moose are very closely related. Or a panda and a grizzly.