Diversity is nice and it’s unfortunate we live in a world where companies have to even make announcements like this. The controversy in these comments alone show the sad state of this whole “issue-that-shouldnt-be-one-but-it-is-because-humans-suck.”
Unfortunately most of the time it’s just platitudes and patting each other on the back without actually addressing any problems.
Hey! Our name is “Linux Foundation”. Let’s focus on something else because why not!?
We have $177 million so spending “just 3.4% of our money on Linux” is enough, don’t you think, guys? Guys?
They don’t care about Linux for a long time now. They don’t even use Linux.
Why focusing on meritocracy to produce a better result, when you can politicize technologies and focus on people feelings, sexuality, propaganda, that sure will help to select the best engineers.
deleted by creator
And they especially says something that they can’t prove. It might just be the outcome of the grunt work done previously by the non-fragile contributors, you know, code maturity etc…
I am curious to know in which part of their expenditures circle* the Linux Foundation put the money for this “diversity BS”.
