• flamingo_pinyata
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 year ago

      I like what this guy named Matthew said Jesus guy’s ideas were. Mark and Luke said the same but weren’t as good as writers. And another guy named John wrote a fanfic expanding on the original.

      And then a guy called Paul (aka Saul) got involved despite never having met the OG crew. And started an expanded universe messing up the canon forever.

      • presbypenguin@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, Mark had to go first, so we can give him some slack. And Luke isn’t a worse writer, just a bit of a pretentious one. John is definitely the best storyteller, even if he does go…off the rails a bit. And Paul didn’t write nearly as much as we give him credit/blame for.

      • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I think it is a mixed bag. The teaching about divorce messed up the lives of a lot of people. Then there was that time he told a guy to abandon his dying father to go preach with him. He called a gentile woman a dog. He said most people will be destroyed. Jesus as chronicled by Matthew seems fond of referring to everlasting fire.

        To be clear, I am not saying he didn’t say anything good. He said don’t be a hypocrite. He said help others and pay your taxes. He said feed the hungry and clothe the naked. But that doesn’t erase all the bad things the character of Jesus said.

        I do agree that Paul sucks balls though.

      • JDtheGeek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not the same. Actually reading the new testament and about what Jesus did and stood for, compared to what the church was teaching, is what actually got me thinking for myself and eventually becoming an atheist.

        The ‘teachings’ of LRon Hubbard on the other hand, are JUST bad ideas, badly interpreted (or manipulated), wrapped up in a fancy bow for those too naive or vulnerable to spot there issues (ok, so that’s where the similarities remain)

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    well, in their defense they are forgiven and allowed to sin until they return to donate more money… i mean ask for forgiveness.

    • ANGRY_MAPLE@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If that God exists, the irony is that he would see right through them.

      The idea isn’t to be evil and hateful until the last 5 minutes before death. I would even argue that that plan in itself would be another form of evil. It wouldn’t be true penance or regret, but instead, it would just be a way to save themselves at the last minute. Selfishness.

      It could also maybe be seen as an insult to that God, to believe that he as an all-knowing deity would somehow not know their true intentions.

      • flamingo_pinyata
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, I find it fascinating how much religious people want to cheat their own god. There are entire systems of rituals and actions to show everyone how faithful you are. But you are showing it off to other people, not god.

      • lingh0e@lemmy.film
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would only be ironic if god and heaven were real. Otherwise those duplicitous fucks go to their graves never knowing true retribution. My only hope is that they die with the uncertainty of not knowing, and their last few moments of lucidity are spent in internal existential angst.

  • havokdj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is not true

    Atheists tend to follow Jesus more closely than Evangelicals, they just don’t need a leash to be good people.