• BigNote@lemm.ee
    517·
    1 year ago

    And your point is?

    Please do share an example of industrialization that somehow doesn’t include unforseen negative health effects.

    Go on now, we’ll wait.

    • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
      294·
      1 year ago

      My point is that capital has successfully fought to put lead into American’s blood and lungs for over 100 years.

      • BigNote@lemm.ee
        15·
        1 year ago

        So in other words you are unwilling to answer the question.

        Got it.

        This is precisely why I say that you aren’t intellectually serious people.

        • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
          51·
          1 year ago

          You have one question in your previous comment on the very first line, and it was answered.

          Your statement on the 2nd line doesn’t really make sense, as I don’t think anyone blames people for unforseen negative health effects.

          What people are upset about are the forseen, proven, endemic negative health effects being purposefully spread for over a century.

          • BigNote@lemm.ee
            1·
            1 year ago

            What a crock of shit!

            Why would capital willingly poison its workforce as a deliberate policy? That makes zero sense.

            I can see capital writing it off as a necessary side-cost of doing business, but I can’t see it as a deliberate policy.

            Again, it makes no sense. Capital wants a relatively healthy workforce, not one that’s falling apart due to lead-caused neurological decrepitude.