Beyond ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ – could a range of verdict options be more just?

aeon.co

Beyond ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ – could a range of verdict options be more just?

aeon.co

alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM to

Humanities & Cultures@beehaw.org · 3 years ago

Beyond ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ – could a range of verdict options be more just? | Aeon Videos

aeon.co

Binary legal verdicts give rise to injustices. Could an alternative system reflecting degrees of uncertainty be more just?

You must log in or # to comment.

Chat

Humanities & Cultures@beehaw.org

humanities@beehaw.org

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !humanities@beehaw.org

Human society and cultural news, studies, and other things of that nature. From linguistics to philosophy to religion to anthropology, if it’s an academic discipline you can most likely put it here.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Food

This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

1 user / day
10 users / week
134 users / month
568 users / 6 months
57 local subscribers
2.76K subscribers
807 Posts
1.59K Comments
Modlog