Asus tried making a phone-tablet convertible way back with their Transformer series, Windows Phone had a feature where you could plug into a dock and use it as a full-Windows workstation (kind of), and in 2018, Razer showed off their concept for a phone-laptop convertible. As far as I know, Asus gave up due to poor reception and poor sales, Windows Phone went the way of… Windows Phone, and Razer never made a mass market device from their venture. Even now, Pine64’s PinePhone has an upgraded convergence edition, continuing the concept of a universal Linux distro for phones, tablets, and desktops that Ubuntu started.
There are a lot of benefits to this, one is that assuming you had a phone, laptop and desktop as separate devices, this can save a lot of hardware, especially since in most cases, you’re only using one device at a time. Lots of people already use their laptops as desktop replacements, so if a phone-laptop convertible can match that, then it can easily become someone’s only device. There’s an environmental benefit too, phones are much more power efficient per unit computation power, and since you don’t need to upgrade the laptop chassis or your desktop peripherals nearly as often as the active compute hardware, you’d be producing less e-waste. I personally also really like the idea of having one computing device to rule them all.
Do you think this concept is straight up dead in the water, or, as phones become more powerful (especially since laptop chips like the Qualcomm SQ1, Apple M1, and the upcoming Intel Lakefield can already be passively cooled and still be quite powerful), operating systems improve to support seamless transition between device modes (Some Linux distros are working hard on this, and Google’s Fuschia OS is planned to replace both Chrome OS and Android in the future), and with the USB C and Thunderbolt standards offering fast I/O, it will actually gain the mass adoption in the future that it isn’t able to achieve right now?
I mean, I think for many applications, you’ll always need a powerful processor somewhere, but you could easily have a single PC in your house that does extra computation when needed, and you could even jump into a remote session and work on it from your phone-laptop. In a world where the iPad is considered enough computer for many people, I can see this becoming a thing for the ultra-mobile or minimalist crowd.
I personally don’t see CPUs becoming cheaper to the point where three isn’t much more expensive than one though. We’re at the dawn of complex chip manufacturing processes like 3D stacking, ASICs, and exotic materials to make them ever smaller and more powerful for the same amount of heat produced.
I was thinking the power of cpu’s in phones would stay similar to what they are now/constant. If thats the case over time I would expect them to get really cheap. The more advanced chips would be used in server farms or in the powerful pc you keep at home.
Maybe we’re hitting a CPU plateau, but I think that’s unlikely. Quamcomm, Apple, and even Huawei are still working hard to push the limits of phone compute power, and we’re seeing advanced cooling solutions like ultra thin vapour chambers and graphite.
Silicon based chips are definitely about to hit a plateau. New materials like graphene (and other 2D materials) and topological insulators (insulating bulk with conducting surface states) will pick up, where silicon fails.
I suppose we are sort of discussing if we will run desktop process directly on a phone or if we will run some mobile process remotely on a desktop. Maybe both will happen.
It’s more that maybe the demand for more powerful mobile cpu’s might fade. But I as far as I know there has always been a demand for more powerful mobile cpu’s so it would be unprecedent.
Just for shits, I recently bought a $20 portable bluetooth keyboard, so I can ssh from my phone to my home computer, and have a portable coding device with a huge battery life.
This can work until either convertibles, or arm processor computers go mainstream.