• Dreeg Ocedam@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      According to Wikipedia

      Telegram Messenger states that its end goal is not to bring profit,[25][26] but it is not currently structured as a non-profit organization.[27]

      It’s basically funded by a millionaire and has no business model. They stated that they intend to create their own Ad system for the one to many channels. I wouldn’t bet on them in the long term.

      • disrooter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        but it is not currently structured as a non-profit organization.

        It is an ambiguous sentence. Maybe it meant they don’t accept donations, aren’t transparent etc? I wanted to check the source but it’s behind a paywall. Wikipedia shouldn’t really allow articles behind paywalls to be used as a source. However Telegram wrote in its FAQ that it is non-profit, that’s enough for me. How they bureaucratically pursue this goal is their business. If they violate their privacy policy they will be prosecuted. If they change it to exploit user data or to sell it, I will stop recommending Telegram.

        • disrooter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 years ago

          By the way, they now have a business model: since broadcast channels with hundreds of thousands of users use to display advertisements, Telegram decided to standardize this behavior, creating a circuit of ads visible in very popular channels relevant to the channel’s topic and not to user data. A part of the proceeds goes to the channel manager and a part helps to finance Telegram.