• Squirrel_Patrol@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s even better is him thinking he’s not going to be in prison long because Trump is going to win the next election and pardon him. My brother, there’s a greater chance of Trump becoming your cell mate.

    • cogman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah… Even if Trump wins there’s no way he remembers or cares about anyone involved in Jan 6.

      These guys are way more screwed than they realize.

      • steltek@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trump is a narcissist who cares about image and the cheers of crowds. If pardoning J6 traitors gets him that, he will do it.

        • cogman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I agree with you, but I don’t believe there’s going to be any sort of crowd clamoring for J6 rioters to be pardoned. The issue is early on, a LOT of right wing media decided that J6 was a false flag. There’s just not going to be many people beyond family members of J6 rioters that want them pardoned.

      • arc@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s true he doesn’t give a damn about these people but they’re useful for his scam. He’s already said he’ll pardon people and will continue to say it because it suits the narrative he’s pushing and what his base wants to hear.

        The problem is he is toxic and will only get more so as his legal issues turn into jail time so it’s unlikely he’ll win election. If he were smart he’d drop out and secure a pardon from a more electable GOP nominee in return for endorsement. But he won’t. So it seems that these proud boy / oathkeeper idiots are likely to be spending a long time behind bars.

    • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, it could happen.

      Most of the country is dealing with a 30% to 50% cost of living increase, and they’re going to blame Biden for it. Trump got elected the first time because 6,000,000 were foreclosed upon when Obama was president.

      • MoistMogwai@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s possible, but as much as people are exhausted with Biden, nothing would get blue to turn out to vote like another chance of Trump. Blue would vote for a tent full of mosquitoes if it meant voting against Trump. Trump supporters have gotten more fanatical, not more numerous. Some of my own family members are currently in orange pill recovery. Not to mention all the Reds that died of COVID denial. Then you factor in young people now eligible to vote skewing blue. The only person I think Trump could beat honestly would be Hillary. Red would show up to vote against her if not for Trump.

        • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That was the argument people made for Hillary’s certain victory on Election Day, that the notion of Trump being elected would mean a huge Democratic turnout.

          Thing is, people aren’t going to give a shit who the candidate of change is when they can’t afford their grocery bills, and Trump isn’t going to have to lie about how little Biden has done to alleviate people’s poverty.

          • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t vote when it was Hillary or Tbag. I hated both. But I’ll keep voting to protect against him happening again. It’s exactly what the dems are counting on, and it’s unfortunately working on me.

            Still waiting to see who I’ll vote for in primaries, though. My vote only counts there in my state.

              • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I recall that she supported some regulation of the internet that I considered harmful. I can’t recall the specifics anymore.

                • Isthisreddit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  I ask because the republicans viewed her as a threat from the time she was first lady (she wanted universal healthcare - which she almost got, but the rightwing defeated her by talking about a republican vision/plan for an individual mandate, which was basically obamacare, she talked about women’s rights, she was pulling her husband to the left on some issues, etc). They knew she had the type of balls to run for president and the Hillary hate propaganda machine has been running strong for over 20+ years, because they were scared she would win. That’s why I’m wondering what got you to hate her - what tactic of their hate machine do you think worked on you?

                  Edit - and I hope you understand conservatives would destroy the internet as it is, and they have been trying

                • ToastyMedic@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  A green vote is a green vote.

                  A libertarian vote is a libertarian vote.

                  An independent vote is an indepdent vote.

                  How about we get better candidates from both mainstream parties if they actually want swing voters, rather than painting their opposition as a bunch of shitbags. (Mind you, both parties are shitbags who force unpopular policies).

          • MoistMogwai@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’m not saying it won’t be close. My parents who voted for him complain about how often they get asked to donate to his campaign slash legal fund. I don’t think that’s a great look if it’s about grocery money.

            I remember 2016. Bernie bros felt maybe rightfully so that he got shafted in the primary. Many didn’t turn out. Trump as obvious of a con man as he was to us, was a successful business man to many centrist voters. I think that illusion has mostly faded. On top of that people on the right were programmed to hate Hillary since the 90s. The vitriol for Trump now is the best shot Biden has, and I think it’s enough.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          While I agree with most of that, I thought it was shown recently that younger people are skewing right. Internet propaganda has been super effective lately it seems :/

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That would be the ultimate punishment for both of them. They have to deal with each other for the next 22 years.

  • ZeroCool@feddit.chOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s good that he’s going away for 22 years. However, the sentencing guidelines called for between 324 to 405 months (27-33 years) so by the Judge’s own calculations this is a miscarriage of justice and yet another right wing domestic terrorist is being handled with kid gloves. Fucking disgraceful.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      He was an informant right? Distasteful as it is, informing has to be publicly seen as providing a tangible benefit, or future criminals wont talk

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      2 decades is 2 decades. And, it’s not like when he gets released he’ll be hailed as a hero. Trump will be dead, most of his supporters will probably be dead of old age or COVID. The rest will be too embarrassed that they voted for him to admit it.

      When he gets out he’ll be 60. Having spent decades in prison, he won’t be able to retire, and will probably live out the rest of his life working menial jobs that hire ex-felons until he dies in obscurity.

    • Melllvar@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sentences can include upward and downward departures from the guidelines based on the circumstances of the case. It’s also important to remember that the guidelines are non-binding on judges.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My understanding was that the informant bit didn’t really help him out because he stopped being an informant and then the January 6th riots happened.

      So he’d stopped supplying them with information before he then committed treason. So it isn’t as if they just weren’t appreciative of the information supplied, the information supplied had nothing to do with why he was arrested.

      • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Interesting. I thought that he had got himself arrested on minor charges before the 6th, to have an excuse not to be there. I assumed that was encouraged by the FBI. Sounds like he was hedging his bets, and lost it all anyway. Either way, I’m laughing at him!

  • Obinice@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Traitors only get 20 years? Dang, soft punishment for treason, but at least it’s something eh.

    • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t think you understand what 20 years in prison looks like.

      I don’t either, but it sure would ruin my life

      • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Historically, people who attempt to overthrow their government get death. Hell, they still execute Guy Fawkes symbolically every year. And all we do is put them up in prison for 20 years? We’ve gone soft.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          they still execute Guy Fawkes symbolically every year. And all we do is put them up in prison for 20 years

          Yeah but in reality the UK doesn’t have the death penalty for any crime anymore, including treason.

          Meanwhile the US regularly executes people for a single murder.

          • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Which is why it’s bullshit that someone who attempted to overthrow the government just gets 20 years.

              • Monkeyhog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I do, insurrection is the only crime I believe should merit the death penalty. Nothing else is even close to how dangerous that is. A murderer may kill a couple of dozen people at most, if someone overthrows the government, that could lead to death for millions and a shifting of history for decades if not centuries. That should be the only capital crime.

    • Corhen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guys losing 1/3 of his adult life, and won’t get out of prison before his 60s. I’m extremely anti-j6, but 22 years seems like a nice hefty sentance to me

  • ilex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why 22 years? I tried reading the article, but they only showed two sentences at a time separated by full screen ads.

    Why is this guy 22 years and others 1-3 years?

    • extant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seditious conspiracy comes with a max 20 years sentence (for one charge). Most people that day were caught up in the events as they unfolded without thinking through their actions and understanding what they were doing, to various degrees. They didn’t wake up that day to start a coup but they did follow along with it, thus they were guilty but given leniency and their sentences were greatly reduced to reflect that. Those people got their 1-3 years for partaking.

      Unlike those individuals this guy didn’t just wake up knowing a coup would happen that day, he actually organized it. Through his direction actions and that of his co-conspirators the events of January 6th unfolded thanks to his efforts. Him and his co-conspirators who organized and created this coup are indirectly responsible for the violence that followed that day. So his sentencing wasn’t lenient because of his leadership role coupled with the violence that occured he was given a stronger sentence.

      • ilex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        In the off chance you know - The fucker who planted shitty bombs in the important rooms - is he considered an opportunist or part of the group? Is the insanity of almost-bombing the entirety of Congress considered part of the “coup attempt”?

        I don’t remember most details. I only remember bombs were found, but they weren’t very good bombs.

        • extant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I imagine they would have to be part of the conspiracy to have planted them when they did otherwise it would be a really big coincidence. Also I am not 100% sure of everything that happened but it looks like they were planted at the DNC and RNC HQ’s so I don’t think they would have affected Congress. Also, from looking at some information from the FBI it looks like these devices were never intended to go off but instead possibly used for diversions.

          It’s also possible they just never had a chance to use them as things didn’t go according to their plans that day.

    • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I saw numerous videos where these guys went out of their to beat the living shit out of blm protestors (not rioters), while calling people antifa - who clearly weren’t, in broad daylight, and nothing happened to them. I can only imagine if I were one of their many victims, that seeing this would be give me some great pleasure. Especially since the “fuck around and find out” rallying call was the thing they said as the brutalized people who were simply protesting brutality.