FCC says “too bad” to ISPs complaining that listing every fee is too hard::Comcast and other ISPs asked FCC to ditch listing-every-fee rule. FCC says “no.”
You must log in or register to comment.
listing-every-fee rule “impose[s] significant administrative burdens and unnecessary complexity in complying with the broadband label requirements.”
Then, Mr ISP, you have too many fees or they are too complicated for you to charge.
I don’t see what’s so complicated. Where’s the burden of writing “because we fucking feel like it” on the bill?
Exactly. How can you track payment but not write them down?
Sounds like someone wants to embezzle something.
Research and development costs
Good. Now ban data caps. Unlike water or electricity, you cannot run out of data.
They don’t cap data because there is a “finite supply of data” they cap it because there is a finite amount of bandwidth.
That being said though, it should still be banned because it isn’t 2005 anymore and the bandwidth we have is absolutely ridiculous.
And the U.S. taxpayers have paid for nationwide broadband several times already.
They aren’t rate limiting bandwidth, but monthly utilization and those are uncoupled values. Besides your plan already limits your bandwidth. The data cap is just an added fee.
No, I mean limited bandwidth as in all together, not individually. You can’t have unlimited bandwidth because you don’t have unlimited resources.
But monthly caps aren’t a cap on bandwidth? Bandwidth is a measure of throughput and that’s not what monthly caps are. If it were, then when you used up your monthly cap you just couldn’t use any more of it because you’d have run out, but that isn’t how it works, if you exceed your cap you get charged a fee, that’s it. It’s just an extra fee for using your internet.
It doesn’t make sense in aggregate either, if I used my entire monthly cap in the shortest possible time period and then stopped using internet for the rest of the month, that would be the most stress I could possibly put on the network. And it wouldn’t cost me anything extra. But if I use 1.3TB instead of 1.2TB over the entire month there is no appreciable extra stress on the network, but I get charged a fee for it. It’s a bullshit fee.
You just said it doesn’t make sense as an aggregate, and then went on to describe something that is literally not an aggregate… That’s not what an aggregate is
It does make sense as an aggregate. These sorts of limits are used all over the tech industry, it’s a form of rate limiting. Doing it on a monthly time scale instead of a daily or hourly one still aggregates very similarly.
Do I agree with it? No, it’s bullshit these days, but you are clearly misrepresenting the problem space that’s used to justify it.
there is a finite amount of bandwidth.
And why after saying “you will not get more than 100Mbit/s” they say “also you will not get more than 10Gbit/mo”? It is not just a note about theoretical limit, but actual data cap.
Because they can then let you get faster bandwidth, but you don’t soak it all up. That’s the general idea at least but it doesn’t apply to today.
I’m from the Netherlands and remember when we first got internet over the television cable. It was already unlimited use. Well under FUP (fair use policy), meaning that you could get charged when you extremely exceeded the downloaded data average of all other users. I downloaded everything I could get my hand on and never got a charge for it.
Now I have 1gig fiber connection for €60, I would go crazy if I had data caps.
Many of the ISP’s in the states used to have unlimited caps. This whole data cap bullshit started 10 years ago or so. These same ISP’s will drop the datacap in areas where there is competition. Hate them.
Removed by mod
1gig fiber, London, £25/mo
There is also a “finite supply” of clean water and electricity, but during the dawn of the Internet age corporations had more lobbying power than before and were able to stave off real meaningful regulation, now the consumer pays the price. We need to stop giving corporations the same rights as people and revisit the 14th Amendment they stole personhood from, as it wasn’t intended for that purpose. Regardless of what Mitt Romney might think, corporations are not people.
My monthly bill PROVES their systems are competent at itemizing EVERY SINGLE POSSIBLE fee and tax and charge.
Them claiming it was too hard always was complete bullshit.
What I really want is to know what the “real” price is. Not the 12 month promo price. What’s it gonna cost me when the price goes up? That should be required to be alongside the promo price.
Last time i moved i got cold called by Comcast to sign up for Internet. I asked them the price, they gave some deal. I asked what will be the price in 2 years when the contract was up. “Oh, well that really depends on what services you sign up for.” I tell them i want only Internet at this given speed and i will never sign up for anything else.
…the woman on the phone just stopped talking. I asked can she not tell me the price after all the specials run out and i get my last bill in the contract. She said “i dont know what you want me to say.”
Apparently they dont want people to know how screwed you are with Internet. I told the woman that i was going to write a letter letting them know that her inability to answer a simple question was the reason i was not going with their service. She hung up on me. Sent the letter and i got a call a few weeks later asking ifni wanted a super crazy deal they “never give to anyone.” I asked my question again and they couldn’t tell me my final bill so i hung up and reported the number as spam to my phone carrier.
Stuff like this makes me so glad my town has a local ISP that is competitively priced, works well, and they don’t push any sort of deal on you.
The fun part about that is that before they were available in my area, they let my subdivision know that if 40% of us signed up, they would lay fiber in the whole neighborhood and we could choose them over Spectrum. Suddenly, mysteriously, our Spectrum speeds went from a ridiculous 20mbps to a still not great 80mbs. Can’t imagine why.
Basically the whole neighborhood told Spectrum to fuck off. Now I have over 300mbps and I could get a faster speed if I wanted to pay for it.
Where the fuck is the law.
Good. That was such a bullshit excuse. It’s literally outputting from a spreadsheet.
The ISPs arguments are bogus, anyway. The claim they don’t know the costs when offering a contract, but suddenly remember each and everything when writing the bill…
If they can’t even give you an itemized bill, they’re making a number up.
My work is making bills out of ISPs’ data. Every kb of mobile data and every call minute is tracked and rated.
If you can charge the fee you can tell me about. Sounds pretty simple.
Yeah this isn’t even the complicated tax spaghetti. It’s just their junk fees.
Based.
Based.
They can charge it. It’s in the system. This was always a stall or attrition tactic.
They got away with murder from Trump for so long they got used to it.
And Ajit Pai.
How is there more than one? Unless you need something slightly unusual like a static IP. Otherwise, everything should be covered by type of subscription, cost of subscription.
Off the top of my head, I can think of a few for purely internet:
- Base cost
- Late fee
- Static IP
- Email Services (usually free and falling out of fashion)
- Taxes (don’t know if this counts as a fee for this?)
- Upgrade fee
- Move fee
- There’s likely a “remote/rural location” fee
- There’s likely an “only option” “fee”
The last two are likely what’s being fought against.
- Modem rental fee/bring your own modem fee (either one)
- Last mile construction fee
- location differential fee https://www.broadbandsearch.net/blog/internet-cost-by-state
How fucked up is it that I would happily pay a bring your own modem fee, I asked and CenturyLink told me no
Feel lucky. You could have had a far worse CenturyLink experience.
BYOM fee? Mf Comcast reduced my bill for bringing in my own modem, what the absolute shit?
Reduced, not eliminated.
It’s possible the BYOM fee is cheaper than the rental fee. You saw a decrease of your bill but doesn’t mean they didn’t charge you a different fee because they doesn’t have to list that out, until now.
I don’t believe it’s done any longer for most ISPs but it definitely happened in the past.
Last mile construction should be once-paid
Then rename to last mile construction and maintenance fee
My IP hasn’t changed in the four years I’ve lived here… why is there even a fee for that when I’ve seemingly gotten it for free?
It’s for businesses where it’s cheaper to pay the ISP to guarantee that it’ll stay the same than it is to pay someone to fix things that break if it does change.
So… move to a business plan?
That’s where most static IPs are sold, yes, but one does not guarantee the other. The business plan is more about getting priority over residential customers for repairs.
Starting my DBA tomorrow! We here at Kait Co. require a static IP business plan!
I had to pay for a static IP just this week because it turns out the new ISP uses CG-NAT.
They’ll just make a fee for having to list their fees, and make the consumer pay for it.
It would be pretty bad for their reputation when its bad already.
But consequence? No. We can’t get onto the Internet without them.
don’t charge any fees then you won’t have to change the system. pretty simple.
You just know that track all of those fees anyways to make sure they bill you for them. Not listing them is just malicious.
Some decent news for a change at least
When I wear my glasses the Ben Franklin in the thumbnail is 3D, when I take them off he’s not anymore.
It’s called Chromostereopsis
That is so cool! Thanks for sharing!
