• Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Humanity successfully landed another object safety on a celestial object hundreds of thousands of miles away from the Earth. Of course that’s impressive.

        Plus, they succeeded where Russia failed, which is at least mildly amusing.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            10 months ago

            Landing in the moon’s polar region is much harder than landing in the equatorial region. This is the first successful landing on the moon’s South Pole.

            Luna-25 was also aiming for the poles; the Russians already know how to do a normal lunsr landing.

          • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            While I understand your headspace. Space isn’t easy even with modern tech for any nation (or company in the case of the private launch sector). They didn’t have the benefit of the Space Race injecting mad money and manpower like the US and the USSR did (shit is hard to justify spending money on while still being on the newer side of certain industrial development as a nation). They also had to make their own systems to get there. Even SpaceX still has failures to land their first stage boosters after getting it pretty well figured out. Just a crazy amount of variables means it will fail majorly if any random one is wrong. Even if they had failed to land, it would still be worth some respect for even getting on target. I think that once AI is much more mature (and not just a large language model that tends to just make shit up that sounds correct but isn’t), then I think your stance would be more correct. As the ship itself would be able to deal with all of it with or without input from earth. Would also be better at making the tough calls to abort or proceed without any emotions/stress causing bad decisions.

            • nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              What di you mean. There was no real time control. Landing instructions were provided well ahead of time and onboard systems too control through out from 30kms to touch down including the precise spot which was done from 800meters off.

              I dont know how many would classify that as AI but it was an autonomous system landing.

            • cloud@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              15
              ·
              10 months ago

              I think you guys should pay attention to more important things than someone landing his shoes somewhere

              • blurr11@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                10 months ago

                If a person without a nation state’s budget behind him can land an object even one the size of a shoe on the moon that would be a major scientific breakthrough and an incredible engineering achievement.

                Simply the economics of the feat would basically instantly revolutionise a whole host of industries. Even spaceX who’s whole thing is making the economics of space reasonable is nowhere close .

                • cloud@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  We put humans there 50 years ago, landing a shoe won’t achieve anything other than boost someone ego

                • cloud@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I don’t, logic does. If india were to take care of the poverty plaguing the country and shit like the caste system in a bunch of years the space program and all sort of research would benefit for the universal wealth produced by a fair society

  • jay2@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Congratulations on all your hard work India. Ride the wave. It’s a great accomplishment.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Three other nations — the US, China, and the former Soviet Union — have all previously achieved a soft landing near the Moon’s equator, a safer region with (comparatively) amiable temperatures and terrain and reliable sunlight to recharge solar-powered instruments.

    By contrast, much of the Moon’s southern pole is littered with deep craters and basins that are permanently shrouded in darkness.

    The extreme conditions in these “cold traps” make remote observation from Earth difficult and present problems for operating sensitive equipment in the region.

    The Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft took 22 days to enter the Moon’s orbit on August 5th, following its launch from the Satish Dhawan Space Centre on July 14th.

    On August 17th, the Vikram lander carrying Pragyan — a lunar ground rover — successfully separated from its propulsion module in preparation for today’s soft landing.

    The mission marks India’s second attempt at a lunar landing after the Chandrayaan-2 lander crashed into the Moon’s surface back in 2019.


    The original article contains 307 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 49%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    All of the kids are holding up pictures of an american space shuttle that isn’t even designed to land on the moon. But its good that those kids have something to look up to.

      • SpeziSuchtel@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        True, it was the sexiest spacecraft humanity has done so far. Now we only have flying space dicks, sometimes with some smaller space dicks attached to its sides. Quite poetic.

        • Chriskmee@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, feels like we have taken a step back almost, we went from Apollo to shuttle and back to basically Apollo as far as overall look.

          The closest thing to the shuttle that has a planned Q1 2024 launch date is Dreamchaser. It’s much smaller than the shuttle and not nearly as capable, but it at least looks cooler and lands like the shuttle.

        • cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you look closer, you can see that the space shuttle is actually riding on a giant flying space dick, with two smaller flying space dicks attached on the sides.

        • Parsnip8904@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          True. Unfortunately it seems like the shuttle design is not as perfoment as the traditional rockets. Maybe when we have orbital platforms.

  • magnetosphere @beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Welcome to the club, India!

    My only note is that you might want to get a bit more creative when choosing a name (Chandrayaan means “moon craft” or “moon vehicle” in Sanskrit).

  • HowMany@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    So what has that slacker been doing since then? Has it quantified the amount of water (as ice) located in the fissures at the south pole?

    Get busy little robot - we have no time for dallying.

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s less impressive when you remember they’re letting the majority of Indian children live with severe malnourishment to do this…

    It’s like NK bragging about their rockets.

    When you don’t take care of the necessities, it’s easy to do other shit.

    Like a person wearing flashy clothes, driving new cars, and living in a giant house. Then finding out their over leveraged and bankrupt.

    Edit:

    Downvoting won’t feed the children Modi is sacrificing

    The prevalence of Zero-Food in India marginally declined from 20.0% (95% CI: 19.3%–20.7%) in 1993 to 17.8% (95% CI: 17.5%–18.1%) in 2021. There were considerable differences in the trajectories of change in the prevalence of Zero-Food across states. Chhattisgarh, Mizoram, and Jammu and Kashmir experienced high increase in the prevalence of Zero-Food over this time period, while Nagaland, Odisha, Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh witnessed a significant decline. In 2021, Uttar Pradesh (27.4%), Chhattisgarh (24.6%), Jharkhand (21%), Rajasthan (19.8%) and Assam (19.4%) were states with the highest prevalence of Zero-Food. As of 2021, the estimated number of Zero-Food children in India was 5,998,138, with the states of Uttar Pradesh (28.4%), Bihar (14.2%), Maharashtra (7.1%), Rajasthan (6.5%), and Madhya Pradesh (6%) accounting for nearly two-thirds of the total Zero-Food children in India. Zero-Food in 2021 was concerningly high among children aged 6–11 months (30.6%) and substantial even among children aged 18–23 months (8.5%). Overall, socioeconomically advantaged groups had lower prevalence of Zero-Food than disadvantaged groups.

    https://www.thelancet.com/journals/eclinm/article/PIIS2589-5370(23)00067-6/fulltext

    • RemembertheApollo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      All the countries with space programs have people in some form of dire strait. Starving, homeless, lack of medical care… Are you saying achievements like this aren’t allowed to take place at all until every problem is taken care of? I can assure you that at no point in civilization has there been times where someone wasn’t in a bad spot while society moved forward. Yeah, India has some big problems, and huge wealth disparity is a problem that many places face alongside India, but you can’t shut down progress because all the other problems can’t be solved.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        By that logic we should clap everytime North Korea launches a rocket.

        And there’s not really any “progress” here.

        Modi has publicly said he’s doing all this space stuff not for technological/scientific advancement.

        It’s a PR campaign to make foreigners think India is a world power. And to pay for it, he’s letting the “lower caste” people go thru hell

        Honestly, I thought people wouldn’t be dumb enough to fall for it. But I guess Modi was right, here you are defending him

        • bomibantai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Modi can be relegated to the annals of history for all I care, your assertion that this program was a waste is blatantly incorrect. 40% of Indian children are malnourished compared to 17% in the US. Indians don’t have to sell blood to survive, and primary care is available to all citizens. Rx prices are controlled, and abortion has been legal for decades, and recently has been made free as well. The govt doesn’t have just one mandate, and this is an achievement of the space organization not politicians. No one is implying modi was actually sitting and working to land the space craft.

    • nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      CGI was fine but it was annoying they didn’t consistently broadcast the numbers and just switching to various individual views. At the time of touchdown they showed a barren CGI and modi on a 40% background. Could have atleast showed the three metrics at a corner.

      • SpecGeo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Agree 100% 👍 Modi ruined the final moments for me. Wish there was a separate stream with just the telemetry. But this telecast was way better than it used to be. Also noticed millions of people left the YouTube stream once Modi started speaking ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Hmm. The two streams I was interested on where the velocity and elevation metric and the live camera feed from lander. They simply didn’t show them after approx 300mtrs ofs ground and went to the speech. Was such a let off given how hyped I was. Just walked away.

    • pinkdrunkenelephants
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Actually the fact that it’s shitty helps with credibility because it doesn’t enable dumbass Moon landing deniers