• teawrecks
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    The discussion is about law surrounding AI, not LLMs specifically. No we don’t have an AGI today (that we know of), but assuming we will, we will probably still have the laws we write today. So regardless of when it happens, we should be discussing and writing laws today under the assumption it will eventually happen.

      • teawrecks
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m saying the discussion about AI law. You can’t responsibly have a discussion about law around LLMs without considering how it would affect future, sufficiently advanced AI.