• davehtaylor@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No.

    I am so fucking sick of this “AI art is just doing what humans do" bullshit. It is so utterly devoid of any kind of critical thinking that it sounds like a 100% bad faith argument every time it comes up.

    AI can only give you a synthesis of exactly what you feed it. It can’t use its life experience, its upbringing, its passions, its cultural influences, etc to color its creativity and thinking, because it has none and it isn’t thinking. Two painters who study and become great artists, and then also both take time to study and replicate the works of Monet can come away from that experience with vastly different styles. They’re not just puking back a mashup of Monet’s collected works. They’re using their own life experience and passions to color their experience of Impressionism.

    That’s something an AI can never do, and it leaves the result hollow and meaningless.

    There is so so so so so much more to human experience, life experience, and just being alive than simply absorbing “content.”

    • teawrecks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      No offense, but I get the sense that you don’t actually know how ML works and you’re just familiar with pop science descriptions of it. Am I wrong?

      It’s an incredibly bold claim to say that a human brain is doing something an AI could never do. That is a very antiquated notion, to the point that I would say it’s 100% devoid of any critical thinking.

      Now if you’re arguing that there is a supernatural plane of some kind that cannot be measured in any way, and is fully responsible for our consciousness, then that’s a different story, there’s nothing I can say to change your mind.

      There is so so so so so much more to human experience, life experience, and just being alive than simply absorbing “content.”

      That’s the thing though, it’s all the same “content” to a living brain. Your brain doesn’t distinguish between your lived experiences and watching cat videos, the experience of watching those videos is also a lived experience.

      I know it’s tempting to say humans (or living creatures) are special and unique in their ability to experience emotions and consciousness etc, but the reality is, you’re a biological machine. You take inputs via various senses, chemical reactions happen throughout your body, and the illusion of memory and experience is created. Now either prove to me that this phenomenon is not replicable in a lab or virtual setting, or get off your high horse and join the actual discussion that needs to happen.

      • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now either prove to me that this phenomenon is not replicable in a lab or virtual setting, or get off your high horse and join the actual discussion that needs to happen

        Ah yes, let me just give you all the definitive answers to all the metaphysical and philosophical debates that have happened throughout the entirety of human history so you don’t have to think about the actual real world ramifications your art theft bot

        • teawrecks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So you acknowledge there is a valuable discussion to be had here. Thank you. I would like to have that discussion, would you? Or would you like to stick with the dismissive and arrogant schtick?

          • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, there isn’t a valuable discussion to be had here. I’m not looking to “debate” you, or anyone else. AI is causing real, material harm in the world right now, not because it does the same thing humans do, but because of the greedy, heartless, scum-sucking capitalists and grifters behind it, driving it, and deciding the gibberish they pump out is good enough to destroy entire industries and livelihoods so they can maximize their bottom lines. And I’m not looking to find “nuance” in the dystopian hellscape this is creating.

            • teawrecks
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              So your contribution to the discussion is that you don’t want to have the discussion. Noted.

              • davehtaylor@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                No, it’s that there’s no discussion to have. But I’m glad you at least got close.

                Also I’m blocking you now. I have no fucking patience for sealioning

        • teawrecks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My goal thus far has been to have this discussion. If you’d like to recap yourself on this thread so far, you’ll find that I am not the arrogant and dismissive one. That would be the person who called the discussion “devoid of any critical thinking”.

          If that is not your position, great, let’s talk.