• Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    11 months ago

    Our track record dealing with covid shows us that our approach was largely unsuccessful. Masking must be enforced, not suggested. This is the only effective solution.

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      I tend to agree, but realistically who is going to enforce it? You’ve got to take into consideration the impact the constant stream of conflict has on low level employees who end up responsible for this enforcement. For those who want to protect themselves, N95 masks are highly effective when used properly.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Right, it’s not going to be accepted by the public or broadly enforced by anyone. The only thing we can do is wear effective masks to protect ourselves. That’s basically been the reality of it the whole time.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        You also need to wear eye protection. Even just regular, prescription glasses showed a 30% reduction in infection rates. Masks don’t protect if other people wont also wear them.

      • AnarchoYeasty@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Make good paying security jobs whose sole purpose is covid enforcement (joking) (maybe) (people who refuse to mask make me angry as fuck. It’s such a low effort way to save lives)

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        who is going to enforce it?

        In an ideal world, the community. In our current world, the government must require businesses to require customers to wear masks and social distance, and threaten them with suspending their business if they do not comply.

        the impact the constant stream of conflict has on low level employees who end up responsible for this enforcement

        It will not be constant. Places where this was enforced strictly did not have that trouble. It is the wishy-washy enforcement that empowered people to do this. It will be a short lived protest that dies out quickly, and the suffering will be far easier than that of covid deaths.

        For those who want to protect themselves, N95 masks are highly effective when used properly

        From my understanding, it is not enough. A person sharing a public space with you and not wearing a mask poses a threat, and this threat is massive if they are carrying the virus (even if non-symptomatic).

        People must not have the freedom to cause the death or others by spreading respiratory viruses due to childish irresponsibility because their favorite youtuber said so.

        • Piers@beehaw.org
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Read it. Then read it again.

          You need to reread it more carefully.

          • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            “I know you are but what am I.” Ok. Maybe try posting something substantive that argues towards something useful.

    • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      People were such dimwits about it though. Even if you had a security guard at the entrance to every shop challenging people to wear properly fitted n95s, I’m certain heaps of people would remove it after they walked past just on principle.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah it was a shitshow, all because of how politicized it became. No one in 2018 would have thought that asking people to wear a face mask would become such an embarrassing ordeal.

        But trust me, it’s easy to catch a mask less person in a store. It shouldn’t take more than a couple incidents before they learn their lesson and make an example for others.

              • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Curbing the spread of a lethal viral infection is in the interest of the community

                  • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    11 months ago

                    Why do you think that curbing the spread of a lethal viral infection is against the interest of the community?

                    Face masks are not a religious headdress. They have been used for a very long time by doctors, nurses, lab workers, etc. to protect themselves from other infections and micro objects. It is surprising that this has to be explained. Where did you get the idea that all these nurses and lab workers (including atheist ones) are wearing a religious headdress?

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      You people need to be stopped, you are insane autoritarians. The crisis is over, we are but fin to wear mask forever. You had your time in the lime light, now it’s back to normal. Continue to abuse this position and you will not get the population to mobilise again to alleviate the situation.

      • smooth_jazz_warlady@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Once again we see the abled throwing tantrums over the idea of having to suffer a mild discomfort so as to protect the lives of the disabled, especially the immunocompromised.

        I have an aunt whose immune system has to be medicated into nonexistence at all times so it doesn’t wreck her body, and she is still fucked up from covid, months after “getting over” it and with multiple vaccine shots beforehand. How many people have you killed or left permanently ill, and never realised, in your selfish ignorance?

        If there were any divine justice in this world, idiots like you would be smote with horrible autoimmune diseases or total organ failure, forced to go on anti-rejection drugs for the rest of your lives, and live with the same fear you force on others, the fear that any “harmless” disease could be the death of you.

    • Cam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      32
      ·
      11 months ago

      Masking must be enforced

      How authoritative. Personal responsibility is the answer. Not forcing others to your level. If your threat level is that high, ok that is your choice. However everyones threat level to this thing should take into account that not everyone in your community will be on the same page as you.

      Unless you want another trucker convoy emerging, I suggest not forcing any mandates. Enforce any mandate on yourself, but only yourself.

      • Cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        No one must have the freedom to cause the death of other people by spreading lethal respiratory viruses, only because they failed to comply with every one of the million warnings about covid-19 and masks. Just because your favorite youtuber told you masks are bad does not give you the right to murder people. This behavior must be stopped at all costs, and I do not care what you think of it.

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          You are an absolute virus factory, you should never be allowed outside again. You stay home forever, we’ll bring your food don’t worry. We can’t take the chance of your germs getting out again.

        • Cam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          By going outside and interacting in the world will always have the risk of danger, injury, illness and death. The modern world is the most safest envoriment that have ever existed.

          If restrictions do return, it will only cause more division and more protests. The trucker convoy that started in Canada was a response to the government overreach in Canada and across the west since politicians and the media were treating the population at large like children.

          We are adults (And I assume you are also an adult), and therefore we can make our own decisions. You can wear a mask. Your kids if you got any can wear a mask. You can refuse to spend time with others who do not wear masks, you can refuse to work at a job that makes masking optional, you can refuse to shop at places that refuse to enforce a mask policy.

          This behavior must be stopped at all costs, and I do not care what you think of it.

          Alright, but many people do not care what you think and will disregard your strict stance on the matter. Not because they are “murderers” which is quite a claim to make, but because everyone has their own threat level. My advice is, include the fact many other people do not care about your threat model and not force your threat model onto every one else. The world does not revolve around anybody.

        • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Look at the date you dumb fuck. Then recognize that the Cochrane review is highly respected when it comes to public health science.

          You people are ridiculous.

          • lukini@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            11 months ago

            You ever gonna respond to people telling you your posts are a misrepresentation or are you just gonna call people dumb fucks? Kinda hard to trust someone posting like this.

            • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I’ll happily respond to someone that refutes the Cochrane review in a logical and substantive way.

          • HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I know you’re being combative so it’s unlikely, but did you actually read both sources? One is a review of around 70 studies, before and during the pandemic, sonme unpublished. The other is a review of 5000 articles which found statistically significant results…

            • Chipthemonk@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              The responded article says this:

              A total of 6 studies were included, involving 4 countries, after a total of 5,178 eligible articles were searched in databases and references.

              They literally typed some shit into the journal search database that had that many articles. They didn’t study all of those articles. Their study is founded exclusively from 6 studies. The Cochrane review’s approach is far more comprehensive and goes into considerably more depth in many more studies.

              So, maybe you didn’t read the articles? Or maybe you don’t understand population level, public health study methods.

              • HackyHorse3000@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Fair point, I did misread that. But it seems you’re acting in bad faith with just one source again. Any search amongst published articles provide evidence for the efficacy and cost effectiveness of masks as a adjunct preventative measure. It seems rather like cherry picking to trust the one place that goes against the grain, no?