cross-posted from: https://programming.dev/post/26734441

  • The Gotion factory highlights the challenges Chinese companies face in the U.S., particularly during a climate of deep political polarization, nationalism, and growing suspicion toward China.
  • A grassroots “No Go” movement, fueled by fears of communism and environmental concerns, successfully stalled the project in Michigan, leading to the ouster of local officials who supported the factory.
  • The Gotion case shows the disconnect between national economic goals and local concerns, especially in communities wary of globalization and foreign investment.
  • Anyone@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Rithmire said tightened party control over the Chinese society, state investments in strategic industries, and Beijing’s more aggressive foreign policy have all fueled a deep suspicion in the U.S. “There’s just this blurred boundary between firms and the state.”

    This is a problem not only in the U.S. but anywhere. Just look at BYD’s recent factory spat in Brazil, where authorities closed the plant because of slavery-like conditions. As a result, the Chinese state -not the private company BYD- installed surveillance mechanism to prevent further in BYD’s Brazilian factory. We see similar things all across the world. This ‘deep suspicion’ has a reason. The Chinese government doesn’t care about even the most basic workers’ rights or any rights.

    Addition: You may be interested in this post here on Lemmy: https://slrpnk.net/post/19370986

    The article falls largely short of environmental aspects of this battery plant, more you can read here:

    Project snapshot

    • 500+ acres (including wetlands) intake of 715,000 gallons of water per day (the amount of water Gotion proposes to take from the local aquifer is more than Nestle’s Ice Mountain)
    • output of 65,000 gallons of wastewater per day
    • materials Gotion has mentioned include lithium carbonate, coated spherical purified graphite, and cobalt
    • failed to comply with any CFIUS reviews
    • no environmental impact study (EIS) has been provided
    • minimal information re: worker health & safety
    • no formalized fire & hazard management plans