• DarkThoughts@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    Are scarfs “freedom suppressing items” too? Beanies? A burkini is literally just a wet suit with an overskirt & hijab (although most diving suits also have head coverings). Comparing that to a burka is bonkers and you know it. The idea of something suppressing freedom that is worn out of their own free notion is completely ridiculous. Telling others what to wear is exactly the problem here, and that goes in both directions.

    • livus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s not neoprene, it’s made of the same stuff swimsuits are made of. It just keeps the sun off more parts of you.

        • livus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh okay sorry. I am thinking about getting a burkini or rash shirt/shorts now that the hole in the ozone is getting worse again, so I’m kind of focused on its practical properties.

          • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I would be careful with that, because the ozone layer filters UV light, which can penetrate regular textiles.

            • livus@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Thanks for the thought but burkinis are Australian, so they are made from SPF 50+ fabric.

              I’m a New Zealander, so I will also be wearing SPF75+ on my skin and something even higher on my face and ears, as usual.

              New Zealand and Australia have the highest rates of skin cancer in the world, so this goes with the territory.

    • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      11 months ago

      No religion is demanding that women specifically wear scarfs or beanies. Denying that this mandate (burkinis and other items) is a religious one, wose ultimate purpose is to separate women from men is at least a denial, at most a support for totalitarian propaganda

      • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        What do you think a hijab is? The whole point of it is to be covered, not to be pedantic about it, like you are right now. The difference is whether someone dictates you to cover up, or whether you cover up on your own free will. And guess which one is freedom of choice?

        • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          A hidjab serves the same purpose as the burkini, to artificially differentiate women from men and create a segregated society where women have fewer rights. Individual choice or not, the end result is the same.

        • HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve seen freedom of choice when a social group pushes their norm on everyone. Either you carve or you leave. This is a very powerful tool to impose norms on people, women particularly. What freedom of choice do you have when you are a 15 yo girl with parents, brothers, cousins, etc who tell you that you have to wear “modest” clothing (fuck that phrase by the way, are men modest with their shorts and t-shirts?)? Either you carve or you break with your social group.