A meme was posted to c/memes@lemmy.world with a partial picture of a driver’s licence. The Lemmy users in the comments proceeded to post all the identifying information they could get from the license, including gender, date of birth, and zip code of the person’s home. The meme is probably reposted and so this isn’t doxxing the Lemmy OP, but that’s what the users in the comments seem to think they’re doing.

Collecting and disseminating someone’s personal information is doxxing even if that information could be found anyway with enough time and knowledge.

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Moral of the story: when in doubt, pixelize any potential personally identifiable information (aka PII).

      • Hoimo@ani.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        There was also Acropalypse, a bug in a default image editor on Google Pixels which let you undo crops of screenshots. That must be fixed by now, but it’s still something to be aware of. You need to be certain that your edit truly removes the information from the file.

    • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      I get by with simply not posting any PII. I don’t even post pictures from the inside of my apartment, for fear that someone will say “I recognize that floor plan, and that dent in the wall! You live at 2112 North Zimmerly, apartment 626, zip code 67202!” In fact, I obfuscate my identity as much as reasonably possible by only ever telling approximate truths about personal experiences, and outright lies about specifics.

      My name is Pete, I was born May 15th 1995, I’ve lived in Wichita Kansas my entire life, where I’ve worked 3 minimum wage jobs, the latest of which I’ve been at for over 10 years. I have a dog named Charlie and a cat named Scooter. Exactly one statement in this paragraph is true.

  • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    This is probably against the rules, right? Can anyone confirm? If so it should be reported and taken down.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah, if the post is not OOP’s own document and not given permission from the document’s owner, then it breaks Lemmy.world’s terms. However if it is, then OOP should know better than to post a photo of their personal ID on a public forum.

  • Fungah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Why can’t I help but feel that this is target anti Lemmy ragebait?

    Oh, won’t somebody please the think of the children! My poor pearls are in ever so much ranger.

    This is the kind if shit you started seeing more and more of on reddit as the end vitrification started.

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    eh. They kind of doxxed themselves. The Lemmites just made it obvious.

    That’s a fun thread though. Thanks for linking to it.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 days ago

      This is sort of a bad take. I get your point, but just because someone posts a little bit of information about themselves doesn’t give you free reign to get all associated information and dump it.

      For example, the owner of properties is public information. If you knew someone’s name, you could reasonably find their address, or at least narrow it down a ton. That doesn’t make it okay to post someone’s address because they shared their name.

      • sbv@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 days ago

        just because someone posts a little bit of information about themselves doesn’t give you free reign to get all associated information and dump it

        I get where you’re coming from. And you’re right - the ideal scenario would be some polite private messages telling the poster to take their stuff down.

        • Dragon Rider (drag)@lemmy.nzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          It’s like when someone is already blackout drunk through their own poor decisions, and then you hand them another beer instead of a glass of water. Everyone gets to be at fault for that situation.

  • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    6 days ago

    Ehh, this is an upload of a document filled with personal info that was intentionally shared. Not a big deal imo, if Lemmings weren’t going to do it, someone else would have.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 days ago

      if Lemmings weren’t going to do it, someone else would have.

      This argument falls flat because if nobody does it, then nobody does it. It’s not okay to do something wrong just because you believe it’s likely someone else will later.

      • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yeah I’ll admit it’s a shitty argument. Personally it’s more that I do think it is wrong to post other people’s IDs, but I don’t think it’s wrong to explain what the clearly visible numbers of a document mean, it’s not hidden information like EXIF data or other things that require a lot of sleuthing.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        It’s okay to do something wrong just because you believe it’s likely someone else will later.

        Capitalism 101