I am a self proclaimed wiki-phile, I always donated when I could. It was kind of like going to the library without the fresh book smell.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Wikipedia is a massive source of free knowledge.

    Conservatives do not like knowledge and have declared a war on it.

    We live in an anti-intellectual society. That’s why a felon rapist who illegally attempted to overturn an election is running the show and destroying our federal government, along with an unelected billionaire.

  • Dorkyd68@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    The right has always hated Wikipedia because it’s gives free knowledge. They think every page is littered with lies

  • serenissi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I ‘hate’ wikimedia foundation for one thing: they complied and gave away editors email to court and censored one page upon fraudulent lawsuit by a propaganda news channel in India. Sure if they didn’t, they might get threatened to be blocked in India but I really doubt it would’ve hold long enough given that whole wikipedia can be downloaded fairly easily (or it is trivial to set up a mirror). They probably won’t get donations though in that case :/ so probably the move is reasonable?

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    229
    ·
    2 days ago

    Elon Musk and his cult followers are getting pissy with and declaring war on Wikipedia because they think it’s biased against them. So basically, Wikipedia is being dragged into this right wing culture war.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    If you’re seeing hate at wikipedia it is manufactured by Elon Musk.

    Someone Luigi this fuck already.

    • poo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agreed, but watch out, Lemmy.World has some super shitty bootlicking mods going around deleting any comment that insinuate Musk should have anything less than a perfectly healthy long life. Thinking of switching instances because this one is failing lol.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    2 days ago

    People who are inconvenienced by facts and reality are trying to start a war against them

  • sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Always pay extra attention when someone is hating on something. Typical sealioning or rotten fish social engineering tactics.

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nothing changed at Wikipedia but FOX told me it was WOKE!

    -People who Do Their Own Research!

  • Joshi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Hate for Wikipedia comes from a few places.

    The first and most important is that most people who have tried to edit Wikipedia have their first edit reverted, usually with good reason, because they don’t understand the procedures and policies. Unfortunately these procedures and policies are what maintains high quality.

    Related is news articles and blogs about edit wars and less frequently that an article or group of articles is genuinely captured by one volunteer who will protect their own little fiefdoms and not allow anyone else to edit them. This happens but it’s pretty uncommon and the structure of Wikipedia means that it only really stands on fairly obscure articles.

    It’s also true that Wikipedia does have an inherent western liberal bias. It’s subtle but it is there and results from the fact that for the majority of Wikipedia editors western liberalism is the water they swim in. Any claim that is counter to this ideology needs to be cited up the wazoo whereas claims that are confidant with it will often slide without citation. Those with a strong attachment to an alternative ideology often find it infuriating.

    Finally there are individuals who would rather have the arbiter of truth be the powerful rather than a relatively democratic institution.

    All that said Wikipedia is a remarkable achievement and an invaluable part of the internet.

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Which “bunch of people”? Question is way too vague to answer meaningfully, there are many people who have one reason or another to hate Wikipedia.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The point is that many conservatives have hated Wikipedia for a long time, and Conservapedia is a microcosm of why, not that the alternatives are necessarily good.

  • Kaboom@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    For a very long time now, they’ve been great about the more technical topics. But for a lot of the more political articles, they’ve been questionable. Bad sources, saying that sources say things that the sources don’t actually say, leaving out important information, framing things in odd ways. Bunch of dumb drama and edit wars. Heck, even one of the founders left over it.

    That, and they solicite donations without telling people where that money is going. I don’t mind keeping the servers running or paying volunteers, but why did they give 5 million to “anonymous”?

    https://www.business-standard.com/technology/tech-news/why-does-wikipedia-need-donations-despite-its-massive-popularity-123100400249_1.html

  • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wiki has been cooped by the US regime but that’s gonna happen…

    What you are talking about is President Musk trying to destroy it as a viable information source that at least pretends to have standards. He wants wiki to be similar to fox news.

    Hold the line!

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            13
            ·
            2 days ago

            The US regime prior to President musk already cucked wikipedia as a US entity etc

            Now President Musk wants to destroy it.

            Two separate events.

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                2 days ago

                Any entity legally incorporated within the US is subject to the US laws and whatever the spooks or and regime whores decide.

                There is obviously a spectrum but ever since 911 it has gotten awful tight for freedom enjoyers

                • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  These comments aren’t providing meaningful clarification because they don’t connect what you’re talking about to any specific acts or events