• Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        If she would’ve not made anything different, how was this then a reason to vote orange?

        I mean Mister T makes a lot things worse than, I suppose, Kamala would have, especially within USA (makes live harder for minorities, gives too much power to cooperations, doesn’t do what he says / says anything he believes wants to be heard no matter the facts, tear families appart, etc.)

        Or have I understood something wrong?

        • NewDark@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s a reason to sit out the election, which is moreso what happened. Democrats lost about 11mil voters, Republicans lost 3mil. Numbers might be off given some fraction has been counted. General concept is solid.

          • Petter1@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 hours ago

            I see the result as more “left” people of them who know the USA election are awful, are to dumb to see that they make it even worse by not voting (since in a 2 party setup not voting = voting for the other)

            I see a bigger chance in fixing democracy without violence with dems in power compared to with rebs in power.

            But this is just a view from an outsider.

            • NewDark@lemmings.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              since in a 2 party setup not voting = voting for the other

              Sick, so my non-vote for Trump was a vote for Kamala. And my non-vote for Kamala was a vote for Trump!

              Looks like I’m so cool I’m doing election fraud! (I voted PSL fwiw).

              Liberals are so funny thinking the system isn’t geared fully towards capital interest and there’s a chance you can bend it to work at the behest of workers is so funny. You’re adorable.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        I think that line of thinking either heavy cope or just bad faith politics circl jerk,

        if you vote for my guy, the genocide would be less bad 🤡

        • NewDark@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          I said they would be the same on Israel/Palestine (or mostly indistinguishable anyway), not claiming one would be better or worse there.

          You won’t win people over by blaming voters sitting this one out for not co-signing a geonicide.

    • Timbits@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      3 days ago

      Kamala was going to do so much for Palestine, I’m glad Americans were willing to trade Palestinian lives to save themselves at home from Trump.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        What exactly was she going to do? The only campaign promise I heard from her was that she was already “tirelessly working for a ceasefire”, which they had been doing for over a year.

        • NewDark@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          And saying that she wouldn’t restrict arms to Israel.

          And saying we need to have the most lethal military multiple times.

          All the while constantly campaigning so I don’t know where all this ‘tireless work’ was.