• STUPIDVIPGUY
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      neither will anybody else. it’s just a worse version of vrchat and it’s already dead

      • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really hope you’re right. VR has a lot more long-term potential than most people realize, and if there’s a corporation in charge of it it’ll be worse

        • FellowEnt@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This goes against the whole concept of the metaverse, in metas own words “There won’t be a Meta-run metaverse, just as there isn’t a ‘Microsoft internet’ or ‘Google internet’ today”. By definition, if one corporation is in charge, it’s not the metaverse.

          • STUPIDVIPGUY
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that’s a lie. Meta wants to be in charge. They’ve just failed to take the market share because the product they made isn’t good

              • STUPIDVIPGUY
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                the project has already failed based on the initial release of their “metaverse” VR game. and whatever future plans they may have I guarantee they will either cancel it or release something completely underwhelming.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t believe for a second that Meta would produce something open and free that they didn’t control and make money from

  • JuzoInui@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is going the looong way around… when a proper functioning brain-cyber interface comes about, look out.