• CosmoNova@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    I think those „success stories“ were always at least a little fabricated by the algorithm that somewhat randomly pushed a selected few lucky users immensely just to show the rest how you can become a media sensation overnight. It gives the platform free publicity as opposed to distributing visibility more evenly. Besides the ad revenue on TikTok is almost non existent even compared to Youtube. It was never a platform that you could realistically become successful with even if you got views.

    • miskOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 minutes ago

      Besides the ad revenue on TikTok is almost non existent even compared to Youtube. It was never a platform that you could realistically become successful with even if you got views.

      If TikTok was widely known for being bad for making money then maybe it pulled some people who didn’t care about money like on old YouTube.

  • Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I’ve come from an era of the internet where - you’re not supposed to be internet famous. That’s like a frowned upon thing where people think you lead a loser life because you got infamous on the internet. Now people are fretting about how many views they get.

  • sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 hours ago

    They miss the early phase of enshittification. The reason a normal person could get 50 million views in 24 hours is because the tiktok office had a way to juice the algorithm for specific videos and show it to everybody. And they were just doing this for free. Just like Facebook used to show content to people organically. Eventually tiktok starts selling ads and maximizing value, and then you have to pay for the success they used to give for free.

    Wait if tiktok is a private company, maybe it wouldn’t do that exactly the same way as Facebook and Google

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      what’s with this curmudgeon type shit? their livelihood is at risk. just because you’re not part of the ecosystem doesn’t mean you need to dismiss a way to make money thats worked for quite a few people.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 minutes ago

        They’re lice riding on the back of a large and very efficient predator.

        Nothing they can do on that platform benefits humankind, though it might funnel some money in the “creators’” direction. They’re no better than the teenagers that run bindles of smack from the trap house to the junkie for a couple of bucks.

      • heavydust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        their livelihood is at risk

        They should make a better tiktok: 5 seconds videos, it will be more insightful, and a gift to humanity… Or maybe 1 seconds videos because they will concentrate their talents. But god forbid they find a real job, that would be exhausting.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      If it pays the bills for those people, what difference does it make? Other than “me no likey”, that is?

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can say the same about the whole entertainment industry then. You just prefer other things than short form, visual content.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Morons who should have been doing that in the first place. You never want all your content and success to hinge on the whim’s on one corporation.

  • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Have people somehow forgotten that VPNs exist? Like millions are moving to rednote but the easier way is to literally just, at minimum, get a shitty free VPN, and still have access to tiktok.

    Personally tho, I’d probably opt for a cloud server VPN if I really needed one.

    • ahal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You vastly overestimate the average person’s technical ability.

      • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Honestly, true. I must be underestimating how tired I am and overestimating how much brain power I got left because, I must say, I barely had a single thought when typing that.

    • superkret@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Any roadblock in using a social media will turn off 90% of the users.
      Which means the creators will be gone, too.
      Sure, you could connect to it via VPN, but most of the content you like won’t be there anymore.

    • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      VPN’s are grand, if you’re using a PC, if you’re using a smartphone the app is about to be dissapeared, also if your bag is monetization, good luck getting a bank to accept digital deposits from TikTok

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        Good, they can do something else to regain their sense of self-worth, such as working the glory hole in a truck stop in Bakersfield.

      • biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Oh right, I somehow didn’t think they’d remove the app at first, I thought they’d just firewall it or smthn. The monitisation part also makes a lot of sense too. Honestly I don’t have even the smallest experience with witnessing anything online get banned in my country apart from piracy.