The Duff CEO with a Windows-Logo on his forehead: “Gamers use Windows because of its’ user experience not our de facto monopoly.”

Next Image: Duff CEO with Windows-Logo in front of a “Out of Business” sign. Subtitle: “30 minutes after SteamOS is released”

Edit: Yo, I’m not saying this is gonna happen. I just want to say that Windew’s UX sucks ass.

  • msage@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Fuck kernel-level anticheat.

    I refuse to buy or play any games with Kernel Anti-cheat.

    And I will die on that hill.

    • Korhaka
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If it doesn’t run on Linux because of intrusive anti-cheats you probably shouldn’t install it anyway.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        And it’s maddening that people will fight to open backdoors to Linux instead of fighting the companies from pulling that shit.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        51 minutes ago

        We don’t need spy backdoors in Linux, keep that shit in Windows.

        Adoption does not include bad things.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Well if they are losing out on sales due to practices that are incompatible with Linux then companies are less likely to use those practices in the future.

        • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          Remember back when people said nothing was wrong with Linux gaming and it was actually game studios that had to start developing for Linux so the studios changed their practices and started developing native Linux games? Yeah, me neither.

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Because people were still buying the games on Windows. If people start actively not buying things then it encourages change. If people complain but still buy it anyway then nothing will change. Vote with your wallet (which is what OP is doing).

            • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              Voting with your wallet doesn’t work when you’re 3% of the 3%. It didn’t work to get games on Linux and it won’t work to get rid of kernel anticheat. Wanna know what works? Making things work. Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 hours ago

                So what is your problem with what OP is doing? That they aren’t personally releasing games to compete with the ones using kernel level anti-cheat?

                Like Valve did with Proton while people like OP were voting with their wallet.

                Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

                • stevedice@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  My problem is that being in denial about the state of gaming on Linux (better than before, still garbage) does nothing to improve the state of gaming on Linux.

                  Do you think that was profitable for Steam (from people voting with their wallet), or do you think Steam did it for charity out of the kindness of their hearts?

                  You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    You seem to think that Valve developed Proton to capture the Linux marketshare. That’s unbelievably naive.

                    Okay, so why did they develop it?