Samsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year ago2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlimagemessage-square293fedilinkarrow-up11.96Karrow-down1142
arrow-up11.81Karrow-down1image2023-08-09.jpglemmy.mlSamsy@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square293fedilink
minus-squaregravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoIn a programmatic context? Sure. In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not. 2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00 is WAY more human legible than 1691696733.
minus-squareorangeboats@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoWhat, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
minus-squareborstis@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”
In a programmatic context? Sure.
In an “I want to be able to comprehend this by glancing at it” context: absolutely not.
2023-08-10 15:45:33-04:00is WAY more human legible than1691696733.What, you don’t remember your time in Unix timestamps? Filthy casuls.
It’s super easy arithmetic too, just remember ”Pi seconds is a nanocentury.”