• ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        The term Brussels effect was coined in 2012 by Professor Anu Bradford of Columbia Law School[1][2][3] and named after the similar California Effect that can be seen within the United States.

        • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          11 months ago

          The Brussels effect is the process of unilateral regulatory globalisation caused by the European Union de facto (but not necessarily de jure) externalising its laws outside its borders through market mechanisms.

          The California effect is the shift of consumer, environmental and other regulations in the direction of political jurisdictions with stricter regulatory standards. The name is derived from the spread of some advanced environmental regulatory standards that were originally adopted by the U.S. state of California and eventually adopted in other states.

          The Brussels/California effects are when the EU/California make a law that applies to the EU/California but for various reasons is followed globally/across the US

    • valiente@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      Bet you they will make their cable charge non iPhones slower… adding some proprietary tech inside the charger, phone or cable which only allows fast charging on Official Apple Certified products etc.

      • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        50
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t know why people think this. USB-C is on every Apple product except iPhone and AirPods, and they were quite an early adopter of it, putting it on the MacBook in 2015. For comparison, the first Samsung phone with USB-C was the Note 7, 1.5 years later.

        They’ve done nothing proprietary with it in all that time, and Apple products with USB-C have followed the spec quite closely (unlike offenders such as Nintendo). Outside of unsubstantiated rumours and FUD, there’s no reason to think they’ll do anything different.

        • blindjezebel@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          11 months ago

          Genuinely curious, how did Nintendo change their specs for USB C? I still charge both my steam deck and switch off the charger my deck came with, but only the deck works with the usb-c to hdmi dongle I got. How does that work?

          • GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            There was quite a scandal years ago because the Switch could get fried by third-party docks.

            I’ve heard different explanations and I’m not 100% sure what’s true.

            Here’s a good FAQ on the topic. https://switchchargers.com/nintendo-switch-bricking-faq/

            If anyone knows more about this, please share! I’m not sure if the Switch is indeed noncompliant or if that was just a rumor/hypothesis.

            • Nogami@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              11 months ago

              Could easily be out of spec chargers. There are a number of prominent iPhone repair specialists (Louis Rossman, iPadRehab and such) that highly recommend against using 3rd party USB power supplies because there’s no guarantee of quality.

              You can easily destroy your expensive device. They even recommend against using the built-in USB ports in planes and transit and instead using an AC power port with your OEM charging adapter to be safe.

          • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            That I’m not exactly sure about. All I know is that every Apple device with USB-C I own works with all the USB-C docks I own with full port compatibility and video out, yet 3rd party docks have fried Switches and to get video out you need their dock.

            If you search online I’m pretty sure people have gone indepth about what exactly Nintendo did differently.

        • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          There is plenty of reason to think they will do something different. Apple is notorious for being petty with their interpretability. They have yet to build the RCA standard into their messages app because doing so would mean playing ball with their competitors. They intentionally make their Mac parts in such a way that you can’t get 3rd party replacements and instead need to rely on Apple for repair. They do shit like this all the time and I wouldn’t put it past them to limit interpretability here because they’ve made the calculation that their customers will think that it’s a problem with the competitor and switch to Apple more often than not.

          • SirShanova@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Before Apple went ARM, they weren’t perfect, but they weren’t the worst. You could swap RAM on iMacs, change out storage on Mac Minis. But as they adopted ARM, RAM was incorporated into the SoC. And while poor for interoperability, there are notable performance improvements in this system-in-a-package design. More so, they do allow for some storage upgrades with the current Mac Mini and Mac Studio, even if it’s still somewhat user-hostile.

            As for the charging question at hand, yeah…they probably WANTED something stupid like they did with MFi certification on lightning cables, but it seems as though the EU has already warned them about that. Hopefully we’ll end up with a pretty nice usb-c experience!

          • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            Personally I don’t see those as the same. NVMe and RCS didn’t exist when Apple started doing PCIE storage and iMessage. It is true that they are reluctant to move to a standard or incorporate it if they already have their own solution in place that works for them.

            But they haven’t proprietarily extended or altered a standard in a long time. You may feel differently, which is fair. If I had to bet though, I suspect that we’ll just see a standard USB-C port that works with all their other standards complaint chargers and cables they’ve been making for the last decade.

            • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 months ago

              I really don’t want to get into it so I’m just going to give you a good ol Louis Rossmann video for your viewing pleasure. The point is that Apple has literally built in mechanisms in their ssds to prevent interpretability even as their old tech worked with it and yet tons of people buy their products with their blatant anti competitive practices and people like you will do apologetics for them. They could build RCS into their app at any point but they don’t and blaming their competitors for why they can’t put it in. They do it with apps on their smart speakers as well. They only want their services to work with their devices and there is no excuse for the most profitable tech company to act that way except that it affects their bottom line and if there was anything they could do to pad their pockets with this switch to USB c, you could bet your bottom dollar that they would do it.

              • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                11 months ago

                A soldiered SSD is not designed to be interoperable, shocking. Because they don’t want you futzing about inside the machine does not mean they will proprietarily extend or restrict external ports. I’m not making excuses for the first one, I’m saying they aren’t the same thing.

                I’m just being realistic and using the information in front of me. Apple has been using USB-C for years, and hasn’t done anything nefarious with it. They will do the same with the iPhone 15. It’ll just be a standard USB port. Feel free to spread FUD if you wish, but it’s obvious for anyone following along that this is what will happen. I will happily eat my words if it turns out not to be true.

                • UnculturedSwine@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  I’ll spread all the FUD. My ability to doubt is something I don’t see as a negative. It’s literally kept me alive.

        • credit crazy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          They also had no reason to use sms for texting android users even when rms exists and they also had no reason to resist USB c in the first place as well it really blows my mind just how pretty apple is with random ass issues

          • whofearsthenight@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            But actually the free market would take care of this because capitalism is so great. Anyway, I have to get back to freebasing whatever’s under my sink now.

      • sweeny@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yep, and Samsung (basically the apple of android) already does this. It’s annoying having all these old proprietary Samsung fast chargers around now that I’ve switched to google. They still charge decently, I just wish everyone would use the free fast charging standard

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’ve already got that. Cables need to be “MFI Certified” by Apple so charging works correctly.

  • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I mean, we knew they were going to have to make usb-c phones since the EU and the Saudis both are going to require it. And they’ve been making usb-c iPads for a while, I have a hundred of them at work

    • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Apple knew it too. Even without pressure from the EU’s upcoming laws around USBC, they knew we would all riot if they clung to Lightning. iPads, Macs, have all moved on.

      Just. USBC all the things. Let me die in a world with one fucking cable. Please. Can we at least do that as a society?

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        C’mon, Apple doesn’t give a shit if people riot over USB.

        The ONLY reason this is happening is regulation. Apple would keep their shitty proprietary wire forever if they could. Compatibility with other hardware does not matter to a company with a fully closed ecosystem like Apple.

        • naeemthm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s really frustrating how stubborn and backward Apple has been with the iPhone. It’s 100% just so they can use a proprietary cable.

          The crazy thing is they were on the consortium that helped develop USB-C and had one of the very first computers to even have the port! MacBook Pros were ALL USB-C at a time when there were close to zero accessory makers supporting the then brand new cable.

          Anyway, extremely happy that lightning will finally die.

          • frostwhitewolf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Am I one of the few who is not a big fan of USB C on phones? I’ve had the ports on multiple phones go bad. They get filled with pocket crud and are extremely difficult to clean out. Never had this issue with lightning. Wish there was some sort of magnetic charging standard. Wireless is good but its just slow.

            • Retrograde@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I have had dozens of devices with USB C and have personally have never had this issue. On the other hand, I used to work at an Apple repair shop and have seen plenty lightning ports filled with lint.

        • moitoi@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          They even begin to implement it in some beats products before going all usb-c.

        • Rootiest@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Apple would keep their shitty proprietary wire forever if they could.

          Nah, eventually they’d replace it with another shitty proprietary cable

        • Nogami@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          Oh I think you overstate forever a bit. They’re 100% gonna go wireless before long.

      • James@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Incoming proprietary cable that won’t let you data transfer or charge beyond 5w if you use a generic one.

  • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    USB-C?!

    On a phone?!

    The Apple Magic🪄 has outdone itself this time. No one has ever seen anything like this before. This is the biggest technological innovation since Apple invented oled screens on phones in 2017.

    Mind = blown

  • BallShapedMan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’ve almost swapped to Apple a few times and now with Google and the DRM bit, even though I use Firefox it still grinds my gears.

    Come September I may have my first iPhone.

    From my Pixel 6 pro

    • Goodtoknow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Only when they allow real sideloading without a server/Paid Apple Dev License

      • Nogami@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I would be in favour of this if you needed to enable a special mode on iOS that would block people from using Apple ecosystem apps and services. No App Store, no iCloud, etc to prevent un-curated 3rd party apps from potentially exploiting those services.

        So people have the choice to use Apple ecosystem and no sideloading, or you can enable “side load” mode (with lots of warnings beforehand), which locks the phone out of the Apple ecosystem until the phone is completely reset.

        Would help keep malware and such at bay, while still enabling those that want the flexibility for their own devices, and also means that I don’t need to worry about my parents messing up their phones because they’d never enable side load mode.

    • whats_a_refoogee@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Why not install GrapheneOS since you already have a pixel. It’s better privacy and security than either a stock pixel or an iPhone.

      Going from Google to Apple because of the DRM push from Google doesn’t make a whole lot of sense. Apple is at the frontline when it comes to proprietary hardware and software. You won’t even be able to use Firefox on an iPhone, you’d be locked into Safari.

      All 3rd party browsers on the app store are mandated to just be wrappers around Safari’s engine. If Apple decides to adopt the web DRM, you will have no choice but to support it.

  • Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s like every family will get a raise since they don’t have to buy $100 in cables every year

    I’m still on the same USBC cable and a USBC car charger that I got with my pixel 1 (8 years ago)

    • BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      That’s great if you have usb-c devices already (which somehow most people do). I’m going to have to replace every charger in multiple places (3-7 at home, 2 in the car, 3 at work) with entirely new ones. I literally have nothing that charges from usb-c.

      • FiendishFork@artemis.camp
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s great if you have usb-c devices already (which somehow most people do).

        Are you really surprised that most people have some sort of device with a connector that came out 8 years ago? This isn’t exactly new technology, It’s so common now it’s even on super cheap stuff. I bought an electronic lighter from Amazon last summer and it charges with USB C.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          11 months ago

          Honestly yes. I didn’t realize so many people have things that need to be charged. I don’t particularly update my tech unless it breaks, so literally nothing has moved for me.

      • accidental@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I hear you, but I think a lot of us just amortized that cost over time as we’ve gotten those devices, same as you will now, but at least it’s cheaper to start now than 5 years ago?

  • Tagger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m kind of surprised they didn’t just drop a pretty altogether and rely on mag-safe and airdrop.

    • FiendishFork@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think that might have been the plan years ago, might even still be long term. I think people like Ive really like the idea of a portless device and they were trying to get there but the realities of wireless charging and connectivity have gotten in the way.

      AirPower proved to be so much trouble they just scrapped it, MagSafe has been a hit but real world charging speed is a lot slower than wired. Plus people love CarPlay and most don’t have wireless capable cars. Apple probably realize full wireless is not going to be ready in the near future and have put plans on hold.

    • The Dark Lord ☑️@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      I hope they don’t do that until they force car manufacturers to be using wireless CarPlay for years. If they drop a port, a lot of car owners won’t be able to use CarPlay.

    • Nix@merv.news
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      Google version or Verizons version or samsungs version or… lmfao

      End to end encryption shouldve been enforced by RCS theres no point for apple to implement it when android hasnt even made it so anyone can make an rcs app with E2EE by default other than Google

    • heyspencerb@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      11 months ago

      RCS is not an open standard, it’s just Google’s version of iMessage and it all goes through their servers. Stop regurgitating Google propaganda

        • kirklennon@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          The whole iMessage/RCS conversation is really only relevant in the US; in other countries basically everyone uses WhatsApp or Kakao or LINE or whatever the local favorite is. In the US, there is no industry-standard RCS. It’s theoretically a carrier-based messaging service but all of the carriers outsourced it to Google so, as an alternative to iMessage, the option is a proprietary extension of RCS running on Google servers, something that is exactly as open as iMessage itself.

          If you want a true industry standard way to send messages to people, the iPhone has had that since 2007: email.

          • timbuck2themoon@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I think it’s still very relevant to everyone else. An open standard is better than a closed system like WhatsApp.

            One day we’ll wonder why we let so much get tangled up in single companies. You’d think Twitter would wake people up.

            • kirklennon@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              RCS the open standard is missing critical features. Google’s implementation fixes that, but is not open. I don’t think we should give a pass to RCS just because it’s open. SMS is a legacy format but it’s unconscionable these days to release a new messaging platform without E2E encryption. That’s a minimum viable product feature, not a maybe nice to have in the future feature.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          It might be owned by someone else, but google is the only one pushing it and the only one supporting it. Technically it’s open, but it’s googles standard.

            • BURN@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              11 months ago

              Does anything outside of Google use this standard? I haven’t even heard of open source apps that use it. The only major player backing it is google. It’s their standard, just like iMessage is apples.

      • allywilson
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s a bit more complicated than that unfortunately. RCS wasn’t made by Google, but they did join the GSMA that manages it. They are pushing it as an alt/war against iMessage, but it doesn’t go through their servers as far as i know, it’s still a Mobile Operator service (like SMS), so it goes through your provider (and I guess Google’s if you use Google Fi).

        I kinda think the smart thing for Apple to do is to implement RCS support (make the bubbles orange/purple or something) and then they’ve done it and can continue working on iMessage if they like.

        • BURN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          But it’s still google backed, google developed and google centric. There’s no way Apple will implement a competitors standard.

  • Tygr@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 months ago

    Need iPhone 16 or 17 with a waterproof replaceable battery so I can swap batteries while camping. Not needing to fuss with solar chargers would be awesome.

  • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Ok. Now I just need to replace my expensive headphones when those come out, and I’ll be free of lightening. I’m guess it won’t be for a while, as ok don’t like replacing expensive things with minor updates.

  • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The fact that they had to be legally forced to do this shows that users were never in their best interest.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    toss

    Don’t throw them out yet if they work flawlessly. Give them to someone you know or just leave them somewhere. Also, you might need your old iPhone for some reason and so you should probably keep one (possibly semi-broken) cable.

  • InfiniteFlow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Finally. Every time I go on a trip and pack a USB-C charger for my iPad, my laptop, my headphones, and have to bring an additional lightning one just for my phone drives me (slightly) crazy.