• mackwinston@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Have become”? They were always this mean. The article doesn’t seem to have a comparison between this survey and an earlier one showing that Britons have become this way, and I rather suspect this meanness has always been the way.

    • SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it is hard for a British news outlet to give their readers a reality check and bash them all in one go without some offramp. The amount of people who would thank for a wake uo call like that is much smaller than the group of conservatives snowflakes who can not deal with criticism and would be enraged.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It also frames it as something that you can easily change. If it was “always have been” people would be more likely to shrug and say “whelp, seems we will never change”. Kind of reminds me of how they frame climate change stuff now.

    • mobyduck648@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think you can generalise that broadly. Yes we’re a country of crabs in a bucket, nosy curtain-twitchers, and insufferable village scolds but we’re also a country that gives generously to charity, still fundamentally believes in democracy and the rule of law despite everything that’s happened, and apparently we poll among the least racist and homophobic countries in Europe which is nice.

      No nationality is a hive mind, we’re not inherently good people or bad people we’re just people. I think we should be looking to tackle our crab bucket mentality but we can’t do that if we think that mentality is something intrinsically part of us rather than something we can choose to reject.

  • Skua@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A full quarter of our society thinking that the people out of work shouldn’t be able to afford food or heating is a grim fucking indictment on what we’ve become. What kind of utter ghoul do you have to be to believe, “If you’re unable to work thanks to a disability and don’t have someone that can care for you, you should just freeze or starve, whichever gets you first”?

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      A full quarter of our society thinking that the people out of work shouldn’t be able to afford food or heating

      For these people perhaps we should present a modest proposal.

  • Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A decade of anti-benefits rhetoric and squeezes on living standards has fostered the belief that people on social security and low wages deserve a life of penury and boredom.

    And death. Benefit sanctions have killed people by finishing off those with serious medical issues through sheer stress or driving others to suicide.

  • Jaysyn@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    The faster you get rid of the Tories, the faster that feeling will go away.

    • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      1 year ago

      Getting them out will help (on every front) but we are still subjected to propaganda from the Tory press that promotes the agendas that suit billionaires, not ordinary people. They can’t rule us until they first divide us.

        • Goms@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sort of.

          American politics are so far to the right that the comparison isn’t really… Sane.

          Like Bernie Sanders is considered a radical left there, whilst here he’s probably (I haven’t checked out his policies since 2016) he’s more centrist, with a left lean iirc

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Is he though? I think that’s mostly media spin, a lot of people supported him and the DNC chair had all but admitted (maybe she has, I don’t follow super close) to sabotaging him.

            He had some pretty wild socialist dreams, that I am sure he buried and held a funeral for after Trumps election. If I remember right there was some literature about incentivizing ownership of capital by the workers through tax incentives. Essentially kind of making workers automatically small shareholders, sounded cool if I understood it correctly. Was a long time ago… dudes been at it forever.

        • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s always tricky trying for an equivalent as US politics are more right wing. So the hardest right Tories are probably in Trump territory and the moderate wing of the Conservative party is more like parts of the Democrats. Bernie Sanders would probably fall somewhere centre-left in the Labour Party. Corbyn would have been burned at the stake over there.

        • Syldon@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There are ties between both groups. There was a conference that was paid for by republican linked groups about 2 months ago. UK conservatives share the same agendas as republicans. They learn from each others mistake to become more effective in their grab for power.

    • Tammo-Korsai@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      They won’t be gotten rid of because the Tories know how to make working class feel middle class, thus they vote against their own interests every time. It’s amazing what monthly payments for a BMW or whatever else makes a person feel accomplished.

  • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As I said elsewhere, it reminded me of Lula’s speech about how the poor deserve to live a nice life, too.

    ‘They think that the poor don’t have rights. … The right to barbecue with family on the weekend, to buy a little picanha, to that piece of picanha with the fat dipped in flour, and to a glass of cold beer.’

    EDIT: Re-added the quote. Markup ate it before.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Picanha = rump steak, one of the finer meats for a barbecue. I do think the flour in case was farofa, which isn’t quite flour, but a mix that’s ready to eat.

      • frankPodmore@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oddly, I’ve never been able to find the original Portuguese quotation, but I assume he did say farofa!

    • jocanib@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article was about poverty wages as well as those who cannot work. Setting poor people at each other’s throats is missing the point (and doing free PR for the rich people who have taken all the money).

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Just 39% thought everyone – the wealthiest, average earners, those on the minimum wage, and benefits claimants – should be able to pursue a non-active hobby, with only 27% believing those on any income should have the chance to go out socialising.

    The cost of living crisis has seen disposable income inequality in Britain rise, with the poorest fifth of the population enduring the biggest fall as they’re forced to spend more to cover the basics.

    A decade of anti-benefits rhetoric and squeezes on living standards has fostered the belief that people on social security and low wages deserve a life of penury and boredom.

    It creates a demand for ever more absurd conditions in order for critics to acknowledge hardship; until a mum with multiple sclerosis has to spend her evenings staring at a blank wall eating porridge to deserve disability benefits.

    In a country where it’s now normalised for a home, access to basic utilities and regular meals to be out of reach for many, it’s easy to become convinced that hobbies and entertainment are unreasonable requests.

    In The Road to Wigan Pier, George Orwell wrote of the working class: “Would it not be better if they spent more money on wholesome things like oranges and … saved on fuel and ate their carrots raw?


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!