glowie@infosec.pub to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agoBuild up to the greatest hitsinfosec.pubimagemessage-square50fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down143
arrow-up11.14Karrow-down1imageBuild up to the greatest hitsinfosec.pubglowie@infosec.pub to Memes@lemmy.ml · 11 months agomessage-square50fedilink
minus-squareWtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up74arrow-down1·edit-210 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarezaph@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up51arrow-down1·11 months agoWhoever did it most likely intended to make money from posting it and they can’t without censoring it. At least that’s been the general consensus every time I see this asked and answered and your other choice is the snowflake bloke.
minus-squareSaneless@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agoCut and paste journalism on little blogs
minus-squareessell@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·11 months agoThe bigger question is why are the censored so badly?
minus-squareDeceptichum@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up21·11 months agoMaybe it’s only meant to be enough to fool automated censorship systems? Like leave it easy for us to read but deny the algorithm from having reason to hide it.
minus-squareAchaeminus @lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down25·11 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareHyperi0n@lemmy.filmlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·11 months agoYou can call them what they are. Conservatives.
deleted by creator
Whoever did it most likely intended to make money from posting it and they can’t without censoring it. At least that’s been the general consensus every time I see this asked and answered and your other choice is the snowflake bloke.
Cut and paste journalism on little blogs
The bigger question is why are the censored so badly?
Maybe it’s only meant to be enough to fool automated censorship systems?
Like leave it easy for us to read but deny the algorithm from having reason to hide it.
deleted by creator
You can call them what they are. Conservatives.