Shardikprime@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agoArgentina exits recession in win for libertarian president Mileiedition.cnn.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down110
arrow-up14arrow-down1external-linkArgentina exits recession in win for libertarian president Mileiedition.cnn.comShardikprime@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 hours agomessage-square14fedilink
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 hours agoYou didn’t answer my question. Why is massively increasing suffering a good way of dealing with the problem?
minus-squarevgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down8·5 hours agoBecause it’s the only way to deal with the problem.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·5 hours agoPlease provide evidence to back up that claim. Or is that just a guess?
minus-squarevgalinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down6·4 hours agoI’m not sure if I accept you dropping the burden of proof on me here.
minus-squareFlying Squid@lemmy.worldMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 hours agoAnd yet that’s exactly how the burden of proof works. You made a claim: that it is the only way to deal with the problem. That is a purported statement of fact. The onus is on you to back that up.
You didn’t answer my question. Why is massively increasing suffering a good way of dealing with the problem?
Because it’s the only way to deal with the problem.
Please provide evidence to back up that claim. Or is that just a guess?
I’m not sure if I accept you dropping the burden of proof on me here.
And yet that’s exactly how the burden of proof works. You made a claim: that it is the only way to deal with the problem. That is a purported statement of fact. The onus is on you to back that up.