• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Definitely. Shield is already an incredibly useful spell, but with no dedicated frontliners (and I do think that someone running a bladesinger would be rather against the spirit of this idea) you’re gonna need to preserve every hit point you’ve got, so everyone better be grabbing that. If you’re all already agreeing to stick to just two classes, or maybe three if you include warlocks, then the meta-strategising is already in the room. Plus you’ve likely got at least a couple of high-int wizards who can very justifiably be obsessive planners in-character.

    All that said, I have run 5E games with some very unbalanced parties and it has geeeeenerally worked out fine anyway. It was funny when six players showed up and the highest charisma score between them was 12. They just had to get creative in social challenges.

    • makeshiftreaper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It also depends on strict you are about the rule. A divine soul sorcerer/celestial warlock comes with minor healing. I’d also want the team to have familiars and summons to try to eat some damage until you get the really good crowd control effects

      • Skua@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If the other two replies to this take what they mentioned we’re most of the way to a coherent party by now

    • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      and I do think that someone running a bladesinger would be rather against the spirit of this idea

      Fine, I’ll pick War Mage