Summary

Child care costs for many U.S. families during peak inflation in 2022 ranged from $6,552 to $15,600 per child, comparable to rent, according to Labor Department data.

These high costs strained household budgets, disproportionately impacted women’s workforce participation, and fueled economic dissatisfaction among voters.

While Kamala Harris proposed policies to reduce child care costs, Donald Trump capitalized on broader economic grievances to expand his voter base, despite offering few specifics on addressing the issue.

Pandemic-era federal aid helped stabilize costs but left parents bearing much of the financial burden.

  • Jake Farm
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Aren’t staff at daycares way under paid? Where is all the money going?

    • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Some of it is skimmed off, sure, but most of it is because it’s fucking expensive to employ people to just watch kids.

      • psivchaz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I just picked a state. Average infant daycare cost is $1172/mo. Maximum of 4 infants per caregiver, so a maximum of $4.688.

        Health insurance here averages $400/mo, for an individual (some often paid by the employer).

        Assuming they are employed, the employer is paying for federal unemployment insurance, workers compensation insurance, state unemployment insurance. It was really hard to get solid numbers but based on my reading, we can estimate about 2% will go to that.

        So we have $4296 left over. Assuming payroll and supplies and everything else costs nothing at all (which is definitely not accurate), and assuming we give the rest straight to the employee… Their gross would be $51,000 roughly.

        The average daycare worker in this state makes about $33k/year.

        • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There’s tons and tons of federal and state funds for individual daycares, group centers etc. Some of it specifically to help boost payroll. Still doesn’t help because it gets eaten away by the bureaucracy.

      • Jake Farm
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I was thinking it would be 1 adult for every 8-10 kids but others are saying it is legally mandated to be 1 adult to 2-5 kids which means you are paying half a persons salary.

        • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Yeah and not just pure take home. Also any benefits(though in this industry they’d be the worst of they’re even offered), making sure you have a correct staffing matrix, and taxes/unemployment insurance. It’s pretty cost prohibitive, depending on age. And once it’s not, the kid really can stay home alone.

    • Paddzr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The owners.

      It’s not regulated and generally it’s hired as “low skill” (it really fucking isn’t) so they’re very replaceable.

      The easiest money is made on old farts and new farts. Nursing homes care assistants are basically on minimum wage while the owners rake in the money.

      It’s priced, what are you going to do? Not go to work and stay with your gran or child?

      • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Really awesome that we as a society consider people watching our children at the most important part of their lives “low skill.”

        Imagine what our test scores would be like if we considered them as important as hedge fund managers and marketing executives.

      • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I am in the northeast and it is heavily regulated down to how many hours staff can be on duty and levels of staffing, the simple fact is that especially for those under twelve (where the rules are generally at least two people at all times for a group of ten, under three is literally 1 person per two children), ensuring that you have 10-12 hours of sufficient coverage (most ppl work 8-9 hours plus travel time to work) from background checked and fingerprinted persons while also feeding the children and keep a commercial building open is expensive.

        • Jake Farm
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Do public schools even have that ratio of adults to children?

          • Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Not in my neck of the woods, they are aiming for 25 kids per teacher eventually in NYC 🙄, and meanwhile some older NY folks say we baby the young cause they were upto 50 to a teacher when they went to school, like we shouldn’t try to progress.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Hey that’s fine, JD Vance says grandparents can take care of the kids!

    Grandparents never have jobs themselves, right?

    • burrito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      9 hours ago

      And some grandparents are child molesters, or are abusive in other ways, who will never be allowed to see their grandchildren.

      • HeyJoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Or dead, or too old to handle them, or don’t live near you, or just don’t want to be bothered. My parents are great, but they did tell me straight up that they wouldn’t be a substitute for daycare. They do a lot but just don’t want to be responsible like that, and I honestly don’t blame them. They watch them whenever we need a babysitter or have to travel for events which is great. My wife’s parents are dead.

  • The Pantser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Yep 10 years ago when my wife was the full time worker and I wanted to work. I would have to have been making $23 per hour to make a profit on working. The cheapest childcare we could find would have me paying childcare costs that exceeded a 40 hour per week check. I would have to pay to have a job. Best I could find at the time was $16.50 so I just elected to save money by not working.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sure is great how Manchin killed the childcare provision of BBB.

    Centrists made this happen. Now tell us again how we’re imagining not being able to afford to live.

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Nobody wants to work anymore! Nobody wants to have kids anymore!

    Fuck me, I wonder why? Every inch of all of it sucks and costs too much.

    People don’t want to work so much because they want quality time with their kids. People don’t want to work jobs that don’t pay them enough to even have kids, let alone not have enough free time to actually build a life with those kids.