Pretty much the title. I certainly believe Trump, Maga, the Military, and the Police will, sooner or later, probably sooner, get around to at least attempting to deanonymize and round up online antifascists and leftists and imprison them. How organized and effective that attempt is I am less sure of.

To be very transparent, this is something I’m pretty sure I’d be on the hook for. I have a long log of anti trump, antifascist, left sentiments, and am 75% sure I’ll be disappeared at some point in the next 4 years as I have no plans of shutting up. The only reason I’m not 100% sure is because of how expensive it would be. But hey, maybe it’s less expensive than potentially losing power? So I don’t know.

Never? Not likely? Maybe? Very? Extremely? Definitely?

Thoughts?

  • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Everyone’s like “it won’t happen” but I remember post-9/11 a specific Linux news site got hit with claims of radicalism and some folks who frequented the site got put on watch lists. For interest in Linux.

    There was a reason folks like me were against all the surveillance from the PATRIOT Act back then, and this is why.


    EDIT:

    Similarly, the Bush admin had the FBI spying on Quakers, the only religious group that anti-violence is such a central tenet to their religion that they by default are considered conscientious objectors and cannot be drafted into the military without violating their beliefs.

    Post-9/11 the government thought peaceful Quaker anti-war activists were dangerous.

    That was post-9/11 in the War on Terror years… It can happen here.


    Sources:

    Linuxjournal gets “extra surveillance:”

    https://www.linuxjournal.com/content/nsa-linux-journal-extremist-forum-and-its-readers-get-flagged-extra-surveillance

    Quakers being spied on by FBI:

    https://www.wired.com/2009/09/fbi-nsac/

  • wes7ley@real.lemmy.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 month ago

    Personally, I would be worried if I was you. The first Trump term can’t be compared as he had some guardrails with his recommended cabinet picks from the traditional GOP. Now that those GOP members have been expelled from the party, those guardrails are no longer there. His cabinet picks are loyalists and is a stress test to weed out any non-loyalists in Congress.

    His cabinet picks will have free will to do what they want as long as they do two things: 1) praise Trump for the popular things they accomplish and 2) take the fall or blame other groups if it’s not popular.

    And it’s not the government coming after these groups that is most worrying. We all see the lengths regular citizens would go to right a perceived wrong. January 6 case in point.

    We’ve all seen this film before. It doesn’t have a good ending.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      And absolutely all of the roadblocks, legal restrictions, grownups pushing back, worry over public sentiment, etc have been eliminated. Expect it to be much, much worse than you thought.

      Any comparison to what has happened in the past is out the window.

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unless you’re doing actual organizing, unlikely. The DNC isn’t friendly towards Leftist orgs either, though MAGA groups themselves may become more millitant.

  • ASDraptor@lemmy.autism.place
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    It all comes to how anonymous you are on the net. I’d say having a mainstream social media account is right now a high risk if you live in the US, specially considering that Kethamine Karen owns one one of them.

    This to say that deanonymizing you might be cheaper than you think, making it more likely than we all expect. If you want to keep using tnose socials, I’d start by deleting my accounts and creating new ones using new data (such as disposable mails or aliases that forward to your real email)

    Of course, a trusted vpn is a must in these cases. And there is a lot you should be doing on top of all this.

    Right now, if you want to keep your anti-trump line, be prepared to be treated as an enemy, so consider the deanonymation a highly likely possibility.

  • Churbleyimyam@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think it’s very likely. Even if it was even remotely affordable or feasible he actually needs opposition to define himself and his base ‘ruggedly independent’ and as ‘freedom fighters’.

    If he’s going to go after anyone at all I think it will be high profile people for maximum media impact.

  • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Online? No. Online disorganized leftists aren’t actually leftists, they’re leftist sympathizers. You need to be in a leftist org to actually be a leftist.

    You’re not a threat unless you’re actually doing stuff.

  • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not likely. Trump doesn’t even know what those words mean. Temporarily jailing them and protesters is likely a different story, though.

  • Atlas_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 month ago

    For people organizing protests and taking part in them, Maybe to Likely.

    For people just posting things online, Very unlikely. They’ll have their hands full with all the immigrants and protesters first, and there’s far too many people who have said something leftist online.

  • wuphysics87@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 month ago

    Given the majority of the supreme court are constitutional literalists, I’m going to stake a claim on very unlikely. That is literally against the first amendment.

    Now, let’s say we live in some kind of bizaro land where you can be taken to court without the protection of the first amendment. (Difficult ti believe I know). You would still, hopefully, have a right to an attorney. If your case is high profile, or you have enough money, an organization like the aclu would help.

    • finderscult@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Suspicion of terrorism, or nothing at all. If the libs are right they wouldn’t care about charges anymore. But since libs are so rarely correct, the government can hold you for 72 hours without charge and the patriot act has a whole list of charges that require no evidence for an arrest. Also statistically you live within 100 miles of a US border if you’re in the US, meaning border patrol can arrest you for any reason or no reason indefinitely.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, they added ANTIFA to the list of terrorist organizations a few years ago if you remember, so anything they disagree with such as calling for the persecution of specific people’s and putting them in camps a racist act, could likely land you in such trouble I imagine if they ever have the time or crazed reasons to do so.

  • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 month ago

    you don’t have to be imprisoned to have your life ruined. there are many relatively subtle ways to do that