• Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Don’t they have many trillions in reserves? Of course they won’t be bankrupt

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Don’t they have many trillions in reserves?

      Right now China has about 3.2 trillion in ForEx of all kinds and currencies which means that this bailout represents nearly half of the total.

      ForEx is an extremely complicated subject, way too much for a single post, but it is essentially the lubricant for trade. If you don’t have enough of it in the right currency on an hourly (or less) basis to support your imports and exports then the machine will seize up.

      So what China is doing here is risky as hell and if it doesn’t work they will soon have the same kind of financial problems that Iran does and that is stupendously bad for an export based economy.

      • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        The way I (state certified smoothbrain) think of it is this: Cash reserves serve as short time collateral when a state is shopping on credit (which states usually do). So your transactions need to be backed by a currency your trading partner is willing to accept.

        Other reserves are exist, but these usually need to be converted first, which adds a layer of delay and transaction that makes it a more long term thing.

        Not sure how correct it is, but I find that this oversimplification works and is correct most of the time.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Bruh they can print the money for rich people just like USA does. It’s the same capitalist system everywhere. The rich get richer and the poor continue to drown in inflation, etc.