• ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    23 minutes ago

    Ubisoft games have such a weird “design by committee” feel to it. Like they poll the internet every few weeks and make decisions off of that. New hot game has battle pass? WE HAVE BATTLE PASS.

    They also seem to follow a checklist of mediocrity. Every game needs a dozen collectable items. Every game needs to have the same l types of quests that GTA3 had. Every game has to have a massive open world. Every game needs a online component and live service. Every game needs a incredible hook, which then they Marvel-safe it to avoid offending online babies.

    Their games come off with 7/10 energy. Ubisoft games don’t move the needle. They’re pretty adequate as a game. But when I have thousands of games to choose from every year… Ill pass.

  • garretble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    40 minutes ago

    It seems like to me some of their games simply just need another two months in the oven.

    There were lots of little bugs in Star Wars Outlaws, but I found that game to be really fun, and largely pretty solid. But then they dropped updates a month out or so that fixed a lot of those little bugs. I wonder if they had just had that extra month to polish it up if it’d have gotten slammed as hard. People may still have wanted different things storywise or whatever, but on a technical level just one extra month could have helped.

    • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      31 minutes ago

      Polish isn’t going to help change the Ubisoft reputation of churning same looking games filled with massive bloaty copy-paste open worlds where you do generic fetch quests, collect hundreds of feathers, and watch watered down PG-13 storytelling that’s tamer than a Marvel movie.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        Outlaws looked great, and had you go to interesting locations, and fly in space. There were no towers to open up maps. The outlaw system wasn’t super amazing in the end, but it didn’t detract from anything.

        I don’t disagree it has a reputation, but Outlaws was a fun break from the super boring Assassin’s Creed games of late.

    • BonerMan@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Not really, look at anno for example. Its just the big titles that are regarded as not good.

      • olicvb@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Yea, I mean Watchdogs 2, The Division, Steep, I know some friends loved For Honor and R6: Siege is amazing (idk how the game looks today tho with all the updates they made).

        Seems people tend to see ubisoft as AC and FarCry only.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          OK, but who gives a shit about a monopoly game? Either play it like a normal person, when drinking with friends or don’t.

          • icecreamtaco@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            I’ve watched huge vtubers play it multiple times and every single time the game ends early from a crash. Or the game accidentally bankrupts a player. It’s bad publicity

            • BonerMan@ani.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              HM… Yeah thats Bad publicity.

              But that never happened to me, and I played both games for over 200 hours each. I even played them on Linux through emulation and it didn’t happen.

        • BonerMan@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          OK, I personally think 1404 with the interesting and challenging campaign including the Venice dlc was the top, afterwards I think 1800 is the next best. My most controversial opinion is that both 2070 and 2205 where good and well made games, with some flaws of course but that doesn’t mean its bad. Shure some disliked the setting and I was septic as well.

          • neidu3@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Never played the futuristic ones. What appealed to me with the anno games was the atmosphere of sails and settlers.

      • LouSlash@szmer.info
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It will over time. They will notice that sales are going downhill so (hopefully) they will start to listen to community complains, maybe also firing some staff until that point because of “financial struggle”.

        If sales will stay the same (or be even better) then they will not try to change anything because “if it works, don’t fix it”

      • Aedis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It won’t but you also won’t be disappointed by it if you never play them!

        • Vittelius@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          Sure, but he didn’t advocate for a boycott, he talked about “going sailing” a.k.a. piracy

  • li10@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Assassins creed has been consistently disappointing me since Black Flag.

    AC2 used to be my favourite game and the modern titles are unrecognisable. They’re all just a bunch of generic, drawn out, mass appeal, play it safe bollocks.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The most upsetting thing is that they threw out anything resembling a decent narrative to draw out the series with diminishing returns. We never got closure on the templars and modern storylines are ignored now. We could have had closure and then just had everything in animus after.

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        It kinda bothers me that they didn’t at least go all in with switching up the story.

        At this point the whole “assassin’s creed” part kinda holds the narrative and story back, I think they should just drop it entirely and have each game be its own thing.

        I loved the assassin thing when I was 12, but it’s kinda cringe now.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        46 minutes ago

        I enjoyed Origins, Odyssey just felt so… empty. I couldn’t bring myself to do the post-game content I was so bored with it. I got to the Medusa and just… stopped. Have no desire to go back to it.

        • Sundial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          I enjoyed Origins as well. To me Odyssey was a more refined version of Origins. Better exploration, combat, etc. Odyssey focused more on exploration which is maybe why you felt it was more empty? I enjoyed it personally but it’s definitely a preference thing.

          • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            18 minutes ago

            There was definitely more exploration but all the “dungeons” were just cookie cutter copy/paste sections from what I remember, Origins at least had some unique puzzles

      • guylacaptivite@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It was. Most of it’s criticism comes from the fact that it’s not really an assassin’s creed game anymore. It was mostly far cry: ancient greece

        • Sundial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Which is not a really good criticism in my opnion. It still had a lot of the core elements of AC, they just tried some new things. And a lot of it worked out.

    • w_l_l_w@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      As in you didn’t like Black Flag, or that was the last one you did? I’m currently replaying it for the first time since it came out and it’s alright so far. I completely forgot everything from the story

      • li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Black flag was good, everything after has disappointed me in one way or another.