• hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        I don’t think so. Metadata is unencrypted (i.e. your contacts, who sends messages to whom and how often and when).
        Messages itself are encrypted.

        Am I wrong?

          • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Thanks.

            That is what the article is explaining.

            The planned improvements are a good thing. I thought we talked about the status right/ until now.

            Also: What does it mean then Meta (the company) isn’t eager to collect this data (anymore)? This doesn’t fit my world view of this company.

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 hours ago

              They don’ want to moderate contents of your convos, it got expensive.

              They are still mining the meta data to create cohort groups.

        • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It uses signal Protocol so it has the same design defect for leaking meta data.

          Both know who and when you are talking too. And thats really all the data the security apparatus cares about.

          • hsdkfr734r@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I guess that’s right. Although I’m (most likely) not a person of interest for any secret service. But the data could be interesting for marketing and insurance companies.

          • Lojcs@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Is that really how it works? I thought signal protocol was about just how the encryption worked, not what is encrypted?

            • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I am not following this.

              Content of msg is encrypted and everything within but signal server knows when you talk to your girl becuase the server has to route it.

              So anytime you initiate a chat, they know that yall doing something.

              This meta data is what the game is all about tho.

                • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  That’s for a generic court. FISA court order would never see a light of day and they would not waste that being exposed to the public.

                  They have technical capability to collect this meta data, that’s a fact.

                  We know that that for purpose of this court case they either did not or are under order to not disclose.

                  If security apparatus want this information, they can get it. Do you really think singal will say know and violate US law?

            • lemmeBe@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Of course not. And the often repeated “they use Signal protocol” means diddly squat because the code is closed source. They took Signal protocol at some point, forked it and did good knows what with it since experts cannot review it. 🙄