My old 4790k finally died, and I need to replace both the CPU & MB. I was wondering if there would be any conflict in having an AMD CPU and an Nvidia GPU.

I want to use Bazzite on it. I’m running the same distro on my main rig and I’m very happy with it.

Any suggestions?

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    24 hours ago

    The problem was caused by a bug in the CPU firmware. the issue is that the CPU requests higher voltages and tries to boost when it really can’t safely boost. The additional power doesn’t get used up and then decades the chip if you are unlucky. It was purely a software bug that caused hardware damage in some cases. New on the shelf units are not affected assuming they have up to date firmware. (Update your firmware always)

    Also it only impacts high end 13 and 14 gen CPUs. If you are buying a high end chip that is 13th or 14th gen then just update the microcode. Also there are plenty of CPUs that are totally unaffected like the 12th gen and probably the 15th gen. Even if you have one of the affected CPUs there is only a relatively small chance of having and issue depending on the sillion and workload.

    Don’t all flock to a single company. That drives up prices and limits completion. Intel has really done themselves a disservice by not being more transparent.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vwHVGoY-Z68

    • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      17 hours ago

      There was a two-generation long lithography issue that they had not been able to solve. You are grossly understating the technical scope of the problem, as well as the trust issues Intel themselves created with the way they handled the whole debacle.

      I’m not ever going to buy a 13/14 gen Intel core unless it’s at absolute bargain basement prices. In a professional IT context, nobody in purchasing departments should be buying the impacted SKUs in the affected date range (and practically, that means “they won’t buy those SKUs, full stop”).

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        The problem has been fixed. As long as you don’t have a hardware fault you are fine. To be fair I personally wouldn’t buy one of these chips new. That doesn’t matter though as they have moved on to the latest gen. The latest gen has less rare performance but is more efficient and hopefully actually stable.

        Intel is learning some multi billion dollar lessons right now. We need strong competition with AMD. Right now they competition is used products.

        Also I would totally buy a bunch of defective Intel chips for cheap in hopes of getting one working.

    • terraborra@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      There were chips that suffered from oxidative flaws during the manufacturing process which Intel didn’t tell anybody about until July of this year. You are correct that they aren’t on sale now but it’s not correct to say this was only a voltage issue.

    • enkers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      24 hours ago

      If anything, Intel’s lack of transparency should speak volumes. They’re hoping to just mostly ignore the problem until it blows over. I still think it’s more severe than they’re letting on, but only time will tell. They’re in full damage control mode right now.

      Anyone who gets scared off of buying Intel CPU’s until they see how this plays out is making a sound decision IMO. Consumers shouldn’t accept this kind of behaviour.

      On the flip side, this could also make for some potentially good deals on unaffected SKUs.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Hopefully they will recover. I want options and only looking at AMD is very limiting.

        I’m sure AMD is not taking any risks these days as they want to keep Intel in the sun.

        • enkers@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Agreed. In the long term it’s better for consumers if there is competition, but that also means being an informed consumer, making good buying decisions and not being blindly loyal to any particular brand.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            I also think used is a pretty good option. Sure some people might need pots of performance but most people would be fine on a 10 year old CPU.

            • enkers@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              21 hours ago

              Yeah, I just recently upgraded from a first gen i7. The performance gain is substantial, but less necessary than you’d think. I’d probably have kept going with my trusty i920 a bit longer if it wasn’t for lack of AVX.