• NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I might risk voting 3rd party if this election wasn’t a choice between boring corporatists and 100% concentrated evil.

    The stakes are just too damn high to risk letting Trump get back into the White House again.

    • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Honesty is refreshing. I’m voting for Harris because I don’t want to see Trump’s orange face every week. Yes, I know what she is. Yes, I know what that makes me. I’ve made my peace with it. No, I don’t blame others who feel differently.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I’ve always critiqued the democrats but I’m so tired of trump. I will vote for a thousand boring democrats if it means removing these entitled, lying MAGA idiots from anything resembling power. They all belong in lunatic asylums, not in government.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      it’s not worth it until first past the post is removed.

      Until then it’s mathematically impossible for a third party candidate to win. Focus your energy instead on removing first past the post, then you have a chance

      • Gurei@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        The only time I went third party it wasn’t to win. It was because I saw it as two main candudates so shirty that there was a good chance for third party to snag more voters than usual, possibly enough to gain slightly better recognition in the future.

        The monkey’s paw curled.

        We got Trump. The recognition came as irrational blame for Trump.

        I won’t make the same mistake of voting for someone I think would do the best job. Now it’s merely an effort to keep the worst viable candidate out.

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          Español
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          You do understand that this is exactly what the democrats and the GOP want? Most importantly, what the people funding both parties want. If you’ll vote for an unelected enabler of genocide just to keep another guy out you’re showing them morals don’t come into the equation for your vote.

          What’s stopping them from running a charismatic fascist vs an unlikable one?

          Stop blaming voters for the democratic party repeatedly choosing the most conservative candidate and pretending they did it for “electability”, only to end up in tight races.

    • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The elections will always be between “boring corporatist and 100% concentrated evil”. Every election feels like it’s the most important one. You just gotta suck it up and vote third party regardless.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That doesn’t have to be the case. I’ve never felt that we had pure evil to battle until Trump was a candidate. Historically there’s been mostly two sets of policies and I prefer one or the other

      • TurnpikeRangers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Except this time there is a literal fascist running. The third party argument doesn’t work when we’ve got a candidate quoting Hitler and promising that this will be the last election you’ll have to vote in.

        • Grapho@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          Español
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          There’s always a literal fascist running, that’s what the GOP is there for. Lately, there’s two.

          • TurnpikeRangers@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No, there isn’t always a literal fascist running and to say that there is severely and dangerously downplays the threat that Donald Trump poses to both the US and the rest of the world. It’s also a disgusting way to devalue the victims of fascism. A fascist is not simply someone you disagree with; they are not just an asshole, or a bad leader, or someone who leads their country into a war for their own gain. Fascists will erode your way of life, they will take whatever they want, they will take away your rights and spit in your face while doing so (assuming they don’t simply have you arrested), they will kill you as soon as it either benefits them or if they just want to for the hell of it.

            Use whatever perceived intellect and moral high ground you can trick yourself into believing you have to vote 3rd party, but just know that you are aiding in Trump’s re-election. And all because you’re too much of a dipshit to know the difference between an asshole and a fascist. Fuck you.