Has anyone else noticed that the NYT’s coverage of the election lately has been more generous to Harris and more critical of Trump?
I think a case could be made that that’s potentially an even more sure indicator that Harris has the advantage than any poll, since the NYT is so craven and cowardly that the only way they’d shift their coverage like that is if they’re reasonably confident that Harris is going to win. If they thought that Trump might win, they’d still be kissing his stinky ass.
NYT has seemed like a Harris campaign arm for months, but Harris has dropped a bunch in the polls in just the past few days. Trump is the current favorite from what I can tell. I have no idea what is happening on the ground in the swing states though, so maybe things are volatile. From out here, it’s quiet.
She’s an ex-prosecutor that isn’t in doubt. It’s a big part of why I don’t trust her.
What I want to know are where her lines are? Who or what is she not willing to trade? Because right now all I know is she won’t trade AIPAC funding. That’s not a good line for ME.
AIPAC has given far more to Trump, and to other Republican candidates as well. Zionists know which candidate will hand over Palestine on a golden platter, and it ain’t Harris.
Who cares about Trump, I’m screwed if he wins. I only care that I’m not screwed if she does.
If I’m screwed either way, you and her don’t matter to me.