• BombOmOm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    using this type of weapon on infantry is normally considered a war crime

    I’m going to need a source on that. Hitting infantry with a missile is…pretty fucking common.

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Section 6.2 of the 1999 UN Secretary-General’s Bulletin states: “The use of certain conventional weapons, such as … incendiary weapons is prohibited.”

      Antitank guns are legal, incendiary weapons such as the above are not. Napalm was made illegal against infantry through this but also antitank industry weapons.

      • teft@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s not an incendiary weapon. Incendiary weapons are like napalm, thermite, willy p. This is just a regular high explosive round. Probably something with a shaped charge like a HEAT (high explosive anti tank) warhead.