• elucubra
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Well, if we are going to be anal about this, the “native american” is simply descended from people who immigrated a lot earlier. No human is truly native to the americas. All immigrants.

    EDIT> It seems that I misread / didn’t read the article. Also, I’m not condoning, simply making a comment, that tries to expose the absurdities o of “nativism”.

    • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 months ago

      If we’re going to be anal about it, we don’t need to mention ancestors at all. One of these people was born in Idaho. The other was not. Get it?

      • elucubra
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agree, but then the whole Native American thing has no place in the discussion, no? I-m just trying to point out the absurdities of “nativism”

        • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          There’s this one detail that makes the two kinds of settlement different, I wonder if you can spot what it is.

          • elucubra
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I don’t but I’d like to know

            • leftytighty@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              European settlers eradicated the native population, the initial indigenous migration settled an unsettled land.

        • AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s part of the discussion because the guy is a racist and told a person of color to “go back where they came from”.

          “Nativism is a cancer” is insane. What are you, pro-colonialism? Pro-genocide? You have to genuinely have something wrong with you.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ok, this argument is pointlessly absurd because you don’t get to stop there and have to apply it to human migration all over the planet. If you’re going to be anal about it.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thank you, Captain Literal! You saved the day again!

      From now on, we’ll just call them indigenous instead and still call this state senator a racist fuck. Happy?

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Sort of. I don’t think it counts as immigration if you’re the first people in an area.