The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today called for the resignation of U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken after he reportedly lied to Congress after two government authorities concluded that Israel deliberately blocked deliveries of humanitarian aid to Gaza.

According to ProPublica: “The U.S. Agency for International Development delivered its assessment to Secretary of State Antony Blinken and the State Department’s refugees bureau made its stance known to top diplomats in late April. Their conclusion was explosive because U.S. law requires the government to cut off weapons shipments to countries that prevent the delivery of U.S.-backed humanitarian aid. Israel has been largely dependent on American bombs and other weapons in Gaza since Hamas’ Oct. 7 attacks.

  • fluxion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is so fucking disgusting. It’s literally the Gazan Holocaust and we’re the fucking Nazis this time.

    • Dadifer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I keep wondering if the US will have to go in to protect Palestine. Unlikely because brown people.

  • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Group that would be expected to make a statement makes expected statement toward man who will absolutely not give two shits as he’s only going to be around for 4 more months anyways”

    This isn’t news.

    • Zaktor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I assume you think the same thing when the ACLU, EFF, NAACP, or other rights organizations make statements? News organizations and Lemmy should just memory hole all their statements because they’re “expected” and somehow you think the only opinion a statement could impact is the targets of their ire?

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s a pretty big leap from “may have” to “possibly” to “definitely did”. I don’t think you’ll get much traction on this. If he planned to lie or sidestep the issue in official communications to Congress, then yeah, he should resign or be removed. I think you need proof though.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m not denying those reports exist or anything, I’m saying they certainly have competing documents that say the exact opposite. If it’s 2 reports that say something different out of 5, you’d have a hard time making the case he deliberately lied.

        • Zaktor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m saying they certainly have competing documents that say the exact opposite

          Why do you assume this?

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            17
            ·
            2 days ago

            Because that’s how government entities work. If you have two humanitarian groups saying there is a problem, you’ll have many military groups saying the exact opposite.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                2 days ago

                You can say whatever you want about it, and downvote me to no end (I had nothing to do with it), just giving you facts. Go back and look at every administration since Nixon and you’ll find almost the exact same thing happening. A few reports versus whatever other Intel they have isn’t going to matter much.

                “We had other Intel that said this was not the case”

                Bank on that being said over and over if he’s called to testify.

                • Zaktor
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  just giving you facts.

                  No you’re not, you’re just imagining convenient countering reports. Sure, maybe they could put together some fake report, but it’s not anything they’ve claimed and a cover report without actual facts behind it isn’t actually a counter.

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  just giving you facts.

                  “They had contradictory reports” isn’t facts, it’s fanfic.

                • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  “you can say whatever you want about it” why keep talking when you just announced to everyone you are not here for discussion but to just announce your incorrect opinion?

                  You are what’s wrong with these communities. You aren’t looking for discussion you are looking for bias confirmation. Or your intentionally doing it which is worse.

            • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              2 days ago

              So are you just speculating here or is there some evidence for this?

              It’s certainly not true that the government produces conflicting reports on every topic.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                2 days ago

                Desert Storm, 9/11, post 9/11 invasion of Iraq, post 9/11 invasion of Afghanistan, Iran Nuclear Program, North Korea nuclear program, Russian invasion of Crimea, Russian invasion of Ukraine, and now this.

                That’s just off the top of my head from the past 30 years. All had reports saying one thing, and a completely different set of reports and intel to justify the narrative of whatever action the executive branch wanted to do.

                • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Other than the Iraq war I’m not aware of any of this and I can’t really find any information, you don’t have any links by chance, do you?

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is proof tho…

      Multiple agencies made reports with facts and proper documentation…

      Blinken ignored those and just repeated IDF propaganda that went against all evidence.

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago
    Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

    Information for Council for American-Islamic Relations (CAIR):

    MBFC: Questionable - Credibility: Low - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
    Wikipedia about this source

    Search topics on Ground.News

    https://www.cair.com/press_releases/cair-calls-for-resignation-of-secretary-of-state-blinken-after-report-he-lied-to-congress-about-israel-blocking-aid-to-gaza/

    Media Bias Fact Check | bot support