• kurcatovium@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      The thing that can’t really be seen in the photo is they’re both wearing socks in their sandals…

    • plactagonicOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I already seen it reposted multiple times with different TV logo.

      Also you can clearly tell by the beer brand.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        ČT is pretty credible and does not use other people’s footage without attribution. It’s most likely their crew filmed this. And isn’t Radegast also sold in Poland?

        • plactagonicOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean that the footage was already used by multiple foreign media. They just don’t have the capacity to go there.

          Even ČT post the attribution only at the start of the clip, this is cut in the middle so the source probably isn’t there.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I watched the program at lunch and saw no attribution anywhere. The shots are all stable and sharp, and the camera must have had a big heavy lens judging by the zoom and depth of field, and the smoothness of moving shots. There is no giveaway such as a ČT microphone in an interview but I think I’ve made my case with >90% certainty.

            • plactagonicOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              Ok, we both are probably right but mean different things. You talk specifically about this clip and I mean it more general.

              I don’t dispute who took the footage, I was just pointing out that the source is probably missing for some reason and that it circulates in foreign media.