• Sneezycat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Is it acceptable? In 4chan maybe

    • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s a daily occurance on Lemmy as well. It just flies under the radar because for the most part it’s directed at people we don’t like to begin with.

      • Sneezycat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I think criticizing people for what they do (eg: calling some politicians “murderers” because they allow genocide) is different than calling names just to hurt, which is what dead naming usually is.

        I don’t think anyone should be okay with racism or that kind of attacks, even on people they hate. Kim Jong Un may be a piece of shit (or not), but calling him a racial slur is unproductive and definitely crossing the line.

        Here, the deadnaming comes from ignorance, not hate; and it’s true that it might help clarify who someone is, but in this case everybody knows her for being the “leave Britney alone” person, not for her deadname. So it’s really unnecessary.

        • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          Sure, but I was mostly highlighting the naivety of coming to an online forum and effectively saying “please be nice and considerate of other people’s feelings” as if that’s going to achieve anything else but to make them look like a virtue signaling fool. It’s the internet we’re talking about after all. I agree with the intention, but see it as a wasted effort. Deadnaming is not going to become the next n-word.