• CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    That stat is entirely reductive and meaningless. And two of your answers are sexist. Not that I think you give a shit.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      That stat is entirely reductive and meaningless.

      How? How is a statistic like this meaningless?

      If the statistic were reversed, you’re going to tell me that you wouldn’t care? If 95% of murders were committed by women? You don’t need to answer, I already know.

      The reality, though, is if that were ever the case, men would immediately put a stop to it, and it would be no time before women were relegated to baby-making machines with no agency like freaks like Vance want.

      • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        If the statistic were reversed, you’re going to tell me that you wouldn’t care?

        I’d be calling bullshit still. Sensationalized “stats” for the sake of views on “news”/blogs/podcasts is nothing new and I will not subscribe to it. I’m not sure which fallacies are in play here but I suspect it’s several.

        If 95% of murders were committed by women? You don’t need to answer, I already know.

        You really don’t.

        This is a thread about Rebecca Cheptegei and you bring Vance into this… something 100% unrelated and is frankly, disrespected to the deceased. The problem is, you spend way to much time on the internet/news cycle and now you have a screwed up view of reality. You need to largely disconnect from the internet for a significant period of time