• shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    What rights could they be impeding on by existing, taking up space, and not wanting to be discriminated against for doing so. Because the rights of the individual stop when it affects the rights of the other. A concept that mainly affects the religious, who are also the group most lost to the concept. That and white supremacists.

    • vga
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because the rights of the individual stop when it affects the rights of the other.

      Exactly my point as well.

        • vga
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I don’t need to present examples for this (= rights should not impede rights) to be a valid general position. Not everything is a dog whistle.

          • PlantJam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            4 months ago

            If it’s a generality, why bother bringing it up about trans rights? That’s why commenters are saying it’s a dog whistle.

            • vga
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Probably some sort of a clashing of bubbles that’s due to social media being a broken thing. We are all imagining our own version of what is being reported and what people are saying and then extrapolating from that the character of the other people talking.

              My fault obviously for entering the discussion in the first place. I wasn’t trying to even accomplish anything, just procrastinating. It’s not as if anyone’s gonna change their minds based on these discussions. Everyone’s just trying to “win” them, whatever the fuck that means.