• vga
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    4 months ago

    Because the rights of the individual stop when it affects the rights of the other.

    Exactly my point as well.

      • vga
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I don’t need to present examples for this (= rights should not impede rights) to be a valid general position. Not everything is a dog whistle.

        • PlantJam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          If it’s a generality, why bother bringing it up about trans rights? That’s why commenters are saying it’s a dog whistle.

          • vga
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Probably some sort of a clashing of bubbles that’s due to social media being a broken thing. We are all imagining our own version of what is being reported and what people are saying and then extrapolating from that the character of the other people talking.

            My fault obviously for entering the discussion in the first place. I wasn’t trying to even accomplish anything, just procrastinating. It’s not as if anyone’s gonna change their minds based on these discussions. Everyone’s just trying to “win” them, whatever the fuck that means.