• Boomers are having their last dance in charge.
  • Gen X leaders are stepping up to replace the last of them.
  • Younger leaders are taking charge of politics and corporate giants such as Boeing, HSBC, and Costco.
  • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    4 months ago

    Kamala was born in 64. She’s a boomer. Also, GTFO with Generation Jones. She’s a boomer. X-ers are those who came after the pill became omnipresent after the mid 60s. I am one of those (born in 77). We are relatively few in numbers in comparison to the boomers. Because of the pill. Also GTFO with Generation Jones. She’s a boomer.

    Trump and Biden also aren’t boomers. They predate the boomers. They were born during or shortly after WW2. That’s usually called the silent generation. Trump being part of the silent generation is of course ridiculous. But he’s the exception of the rule, I guess. But both are born very late in that generation, so they are its last remnants I guess. Soon they will all be gone.

    • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Boomers is short for Baby Boomers which were literally the babies born after WW2 vets came home and had families. I don’t know why your misinformed comment has so many upvotes

      • Zaktor
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        What’s the fact you’re objecting to? The only thing wrong is Trump as a Silent as he’s born in the very first year of the Boomers. Everything else is following the common definitions.

        • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You might be right there. I’m German. And many a man did come back later, after the war, here. A lot of refugees were forcefully relocated from what is today Poland. Also a lot of POWs came back long after the war was over. So the baby boom was a bit delayed over here.

          • Akasazh@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Then again, you’re a computer scientist, not an historian, and therefore excusable :p

            • Zaktor
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              It all depends on whether you start counting from 0 or 1!

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Where does the common definition of ‘Boomer’ say it starts after 1946 (the year Trump was born) and stops with the birth control pill (1960)?

          I have never seen such a definition anywhere. Certainly not one that says it starts at least two years after the end of WWII.

          • Zaktor
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Huh? I’m saying Trump is Boomer because Boomers start in 1946. And it goes to 1964, which is when the birth control pill was recognized as a contraceptive. I don’t know if X is defined by that in the same way Boomers are defined by a specific event, but it lines up precisely.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomers

              • Zaktor
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                You literally just asked about where the common definition came from. Read the first fucking paragraph man.

                • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  I did not ask anything. I certainly didn’t ask that:

                  Pretty amusing that you’re accusing me of not reading though.

                  • Zaktor
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    You’re in the wrong fucking thread. Get it together before you go randomly aggro.

                    You, in the post I originally replied to:

                    Where does the common definition of ‘Boomer’ say it starts after 1946 (the year Trump was born) and stops with the birth control pill (1960)?

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      We are relatively few in numbers in comparison to the boomers

      That’s not true. The birth rate dropped slightly from the low 20s per 1000 in the 40s to the mid-60s, then dropped to the high teens in the Gen X era. Relatively few in numbers implies that there were twice as many boomers or something. The reality is that there were about 75 million baby boomers births, and about 65 million Gen X.

      Trump is a boomer (1946, same year as Clinton and Bush), Biden is a “silent generation” guy, born before the end of WWII. He’s actually the first (and presumably last) Silent Generation president. The ones before him were all boomers or “greatest” generation.

      • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        While those facts might not be wrong in your neck of the woods, they are at least very, very US centric. That is of course ok, as we are talking about the US candidates here. But generally, keep in mind that the world is way bigger than the US. You make up a whole of 4% of the world’s population. And those numbers all vary from country to country.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          The article and the discussion was US-centric. I’m aware things are different outside the US. I don’t live in the US. I’m merely pointing out that for an American to think that the baby boom was some kind of massive shift in population that means the number of boomers dwarfs any other generation is wrong.