The Labour party has won over 400 seats (out of 650) in the 2024 UK General Elections, and Keir Starmer is expected to replace Rishi Sunak as Prime Minister. The Conservatives, in power for the last fourteen years, have suffered a rout, losing over two-thirds of their seats. The SNP has collapsed in Scotland, mostly to Labour, and the Liberal Democrats have gained over sixty seats.

    • twinnie@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      They didn’t do that bad really, it just wasn’t reflected in the results. A new further right party showed up and split the right wing vote, which is largely why Labour won. If you look at the total votes the righter win parties did pretty well (Tories are really all that right wing but they did get the right wing vote).

      • DJDarren@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, as much as I hate everything Farage stands for, fair play to him for splitting the Tory voters and delivering a Labour government. I just wish that kind of thing wasn’t necessary.

      • fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        New party (Reform) skyrocketed in fact. Had the vote not been split, conservatives would have won many more seats. Next cycle will be… Interesting. Especially with Nigel Farage getting a seat (Trump-like, seeded discontent leading to Brexit, who’s never been elected before).

    • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Mind describing to us what you consider a right, but not far right, political stance is? Examples of both economic and social policies would be welcome.

              • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 months ago

                Sure thing, chief.

                Neoliberal economics (low corporate taxes, weak regulations, privatization, weak welfare system, government intervention is used to facilitate further market expansion and prop up big businesses).

                Large budgets for the army and the police without much external oversight, while still maintaining some level of restraint on what they can do.

                Making it harder to get a visa and even harder to get a citizenship.

                Hard-line stance against what are considered vices by the society the conservatives in question inhabit.

                A preservation of the monarchy in countries which have them.

                Incentives to give birth.

                • pipsqueak1984@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Not a bad lisy actually, although I heavily disagree with the military and police budgets line… Authoritarian left regimes are known for very high police and military budgets even with heavily states controlled economies.

                  Edit: police and military spending tends to relate more to the libertarian-authoritarian spectrum rather than the socioeconomic left-right spectrum

                  • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Conservatism is tends towards some degree of authoritarianism.

                    There are no policies that are uniquely conservative, or uniquely anything for that matter. When taken together, however, you can see conservativism form before your eyes.