Ramble is an effort to also promote the use of alternative internets ie. not just https regular web.

The great thing about their setup is that it allows users from various anonymity networks to actually interact with one another in a seamless, transparent fashion. Someone browsing their Onion Service may be responding to a post made from the clearnet, and have their response upvoted from someone who agrees with their comment from the I2P eepsite while a Yggdrasil user is creating a forum. Regardless of the method you choose to access the Ramble website, you’d be interacting with people from outside of your network in a relatively unique fashion. You can login to your account through any network that you wish. Post on your phone using the clearnet website, come home, and hop on the I2P eepsite and you’ll have everything right there.

Another interesting feature is a fully transparent moderation log, showing any banned users or other deletions made (a bit like Aether does) with a reason. You only need to choose any username and password to get going, no e-mail or phone number requested to register.

See https://ramble.pw/f/ramble/3/welcome-to-ramble

#technology #alternativeto #reddit #ramble #privacy

  • QuentinCallaghanA
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    On the front page I’m seeing a post by an user named “Hitler_Was_Right”. Totally promising and interesting platform with lots of insightful minds contributing to the marketplace of ideas!

    • SFloss (they/them)@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 years ago

      The bane of almost every open-source, decentralized link agreggator is their weird obsession with absolute freedom of speech that just attracts the most toxic, whatever-phobic people.

    • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yes I have also noticed a few attacks on other networks like Scuttlebutt. An interesting point I picked up there, and did not really think a lot about, is that apparently many social networks are classified as to where they lie on the US political spectrum, and that can then mean they are good or bad ;-) As a non-American, I did not know that classification was a thing…

      • Nasst@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 years ago

        I’m a non-american (argentinian), and don’t really feel comfortable sharing a platform with literal white supremacists.

      • QuentinCallaghanA
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 years ago

        As a non-American, I don’t see pointing out a white supremacist user as an attack towards a platform.

        • N0b3d@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 years ago

          The last sentence of your earlier response definitely suggested you were judging the platform based on that one user though.

          You didn’t even say what the person said, just left people to guess based on the username (for all we know it’s a left wing radical doing the internet equivalent of performance art), people just can’t tell without context.

          • QuentinCallaghanA
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            If you look at that user’s post history, it’s far from “the internet equivalent of performance art”.

        • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Basic user comments about a network that I see on other networks - many are quick to label a network as liberal and conservative, which I gather are generally attributed to US politics (we don’t refer to our parties by those terms at least - just a party name is used). I’m pretty sure sites themselves are not one or the other, but seems many users judge by posts or comments they see and then are quick to label a site.

          • lemony@lemmy.161.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 years ago

            Sites themselves are one or the other, they have specific moderation teams that get instructions how to moderate (or not moderate). These rules do in themselves have political meaning. Not just in the US, but everywhere.

    • eman@lemmy.161.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      Its not just one Post but multiple from them on the frontpage. Also other posts and comments confirm a right wing leading.

    • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 years ago

      Just note I posted this link purely as a newly discovered (to me) social network (like I’ve done for as few other networks too). I’m not recommending one over the other at all. I’m still digging a bit deeper into it, and have now noticed Raddle as well. It is interesting to note the differences, and I’m sure anyone interested will get a feel for a good fit for themselves. Yes unfortunately networks will tend to be perceived as left, right or centre I suppose relative to one’s one’s beliefs.

      Certainly in my own country (South Africa) we also have quite a few laws restricting any discrimination as well any threats of violence or insurrection. Personally I prefer to keep to good tech news myself ;-)

  • Thann@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Is this centralized proprietary bullshit, or am I missing something?

      • ancom@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 years ago

        sometimes laugh in my bed, thinking that marxists are building a federated network while anarchists are building a centralized one. It’s funny, the differences between theory and practice?

        yeah me too. Thought they don’t argue for centralization, but for autonomous spaces, that do interact with each other without agreeing to a specific standard.

        They propose to use hyperlinks as a means for that. Thought unfortunate, raddle is the only online community that is interactive and not anarchistnews.org (the later one is to toxic for me) to which they link to. Raddle is nice, but sometimes also a bit rough. I would appreciate the existence of a place that could interact with raddle, but is on at the same independent from it.

    • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 years ago

      Actually nothing is stated about open source so we’d have to assume then it is not. Any open source site does usually state this pretty clearly.

      • Thann@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        3 years ago

        Yup, open source projects say it loudly and proudly, and GPL projects are obligated to lol

          • Thann@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 years ago

            Ahh, excellent find. Postmill uses the zlib licence which states:

            The origin of this software must not be misrepresented;

            One could argue, that by not saying that they’re running postmill on their frontpage, they’re “missrepresenting the origin” 🤔

            • GadgeteerZA@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              Yes I’ve actually asked them too on that same link whether they are passing the improvements back to PostMill. The absolute worst is using and building on an open source project, and not giving anything back (not even the credit). Thanks for that license detail as well, as I can bring that up. Raddle (not to be confused with Ramble) is very clear that they are using PostMill and state that also on their footers.

              • Thann@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                3 years ago

                Yeah, it is distasteful. The GPL is why Linux is bigger than BSD; forced cooperation is better for everyone.